Whistle blowing is becoming more and more common these days, but in most cases, it has devastating effects. Several of these people had to find new jobs, relocate, or settle for less money in their new job. It can be very scandalous, often involving law- suits (Ezell, 2003).

The main issue is if it is moral. Many people argue that you have obligations of loyalty to your colleagues an your place of employment. Corporations today are run with the expectations that they will function in ways that are compatible with the public interest. But in some cases, their main concern is maximizing their profits. This is when it can become disreputable (Vinten, 1994). A good example of an employee who I bel

. I believe whistle blowing is acceptable if you are speaking out for the public’s best interest. You must do several things before you even consider whistle blowing. You must be sure that the public is entitled to know. You must consider all other alternatives, and measure all the benefits and harms of your actions. I believe that these easy steps are a good way of minimizing risk, and will help determine if blowing the whistle is such a good idea. First, make sure the situation is one that warrants whistle blowing. Secondly, you should carefully examine your motives. Third, verify your information. Fourth, determine the type of wrongdoing involved and to whom it should be reported. Fifth, state your allegations in appropriate ways. Sixth, decide whether the whistle blowing should be internal or external and if it should be open or anonymous. Seventh, make sure you follow proper guidelines in reporting the wrongdoing. And last you should consult a lawyer and anticipate retaliation (Vinten, 1994).

Most people argue that blowing the whistle is mor

Some topics in this essay:
Board NTSB, Whistle-blowing Whistle, Gellert MrGellert, Florida Gellert, whistle blowing, blow whistle, vinten 1994, gellert wrote report, wrote report, eastern airlines, people argue, main issue, blowing whistle, gellert wrote, minimizing risk,