I do not agree with censorship of the internet. The regulation of information on the internet takes away people’s right to free speech, which violates the First Amendment. Any material should be allowed on the internet because it is up to each individual to decide whether or not to view it. “The Internet is something that most of us buy access to and which we then choose to surf on our own” (Marrin, Witneyer, and Gleser). People have control over the material they and their children can access. It is the parent’s responsibility to control and limit their children’s access to the internet, not the government.

One of the main reasons for censorship is that material on the internet can be harmful to children. “Like radio, movies, and TV before it, the Internet has raised concern about its possible negative impact on children. Teaching your children how to use this technology and to make wise choices is one of the most important things a parent can do” (American Library Association). Parents should take the responsibility for keeping harmful things away from their children. They could interact more with their children, and supervise them when they log onto the internet. They could place the computer in a room where they could easily monitor the child’s usage. “Spending time online with your children is the best way both to learn about the Internet and to teach your children responsibility, good conduct, and the values that are important to you” (American Library Association). There are other alternatives to censorship which can prevent children from the access of the illicit material. Some of the Internet Service Providers will automatically block obscene content from reaching a computer. Some offer parental account controls, which allow the parent to decide what web sites a child can visit or whether or not they chat with others online. Logging software is also available, which allows parents to trace the activities of a child.

My point of view on the censorship of the internet is that it is wrong. People who gain access to the internet should be responsible enough to find out what can actually be found on it. They should know about all the information that would be positive and helpful to them, and they should also know about the information that would be negative and disturbing. If they still want to use the internet, then it is their choice to access it. It is not right to regulate and limit people’s usage of the internet.

The First Amendment gives us the right to say what we want, but our freedom of speech is not protected when it comes to indecency. The Communication Decency Act (CDA) was the government’s first attempt at censoring speech on the internet. “The Internet can also be a source of indecent material. To prevent such material from reaching children, Congress in 1996 passed the Communication Decency Act, which made it a federal crime to use the Internet to transmit obscene material to someone under eighteen years of age or to post material in a way that made it available to mino

Some topics in this essay:
CON POSITION, IV CONCLUSION, PRO POSITION, , Service Providers, Witneyer Gleser, Association Parents, Protection Act, Supreme Court, Decency Act, people control, witneyer gleser, marrin witneyer, supreme court, web pages, material available, obscene material, freedom speech, material internet, marrin witneyer gleser, parental account controls, online protection, block obscene content, content reaching computer, obscene content reaching,