I do not agree with censorship of the internet. The regulation of information on the internet takes away people’s right to free speech, which violates the First Amendment. Any material should be allowed on the internet because it is up to each individual to decide whether or not to view it. “The Internet is something that most of us buy access to and which we then choose to surf on our own” (Marrin, Witneyer, and Gleser). People have control over the material they and their children can access. It is the parent’s responsibility to control and limit their children’s access to the internet, not the government.

Some topics in this essay:
CON POSITION, IV CONCLUSION, PRO POSITION, , Service Providers, Witneyer Gleser, Association Parents, Protection Act, Supreme Court, Decency Act, people control, witneyer gleser, marrin witneyer, supreme court, web pages, material available, obscene material, freedom speech, material internet, marrin witneyer gleser, parental account controls, online protection, block obscene content, content reaching computer, obscene content reaching,