Before we break down drug testing in the workplace, we must make clear that workplace drug testing is different from drug testing in other settings. DesJardins and Duska state that, “we view the employer-employee relationship as essentially contractual.” Meaning that unlike a relationship between siblings and their parents, this relationship is voluntary. In a relationship such as this, there are certain areas where the employee can keep private and the employer cannot touch. DesJardins and Duska say that, “the employee has a right to privacy.”

Now to say that drug use in the work place will harm a companies business through increased accidents and absence is a strong argument. However

, DesJardins and Duska stated that not all jobs have a severe enough danger to validate an employer coming to know of an employees drug use. Certain guidelines should be followed such that these dangers should be “clear and present” according to DesJardins and Duska. Of course one could argue that all jobs in the long run or even short run can cause harm. But the jobs that have “clear and present” potential for harm would be such occupations in transportation and hospitals where the risk or harm is greater than that of a secretary. If even to say that those jobs should be drug tested, then DesJardins and Duska make the argument that not everyone should be tested. Some pilots and surgeons have been working for ten, fifteen, even twenty years with outstanding results in service. There is less of a reason to drug test or investigate these people than a person who has a record of being unreliable or irregular behavior. DesJardins and Duska make a good point by saying, “Presuming that every airline pilot is equally threatening is to deny individual the respect that they deserve as autonomous, rational agents.” “It is the likelihood of causing harm, and not the fact of being an airline pilot per se, that is relevant in deciding which employees in critical job to test.” Not everyone in a job that’s potential of causing harm is “clear and present” should be tested.

Drug testing can be an effective deterrent when there is regular or random testing of all employees as it states in DesJardins and Duska’s article. The article states that employers should sacrifice some innocent emplo

Some topics in this essay:
DesJardins Duska, DesJardins Duska’s, drug testing, desjardins duska, Employment Drug, prevent harm, “clear present”, drug test, probable cause, harm workplace, regular random, deterrent regular random, according desjardins duska, prevent danger workplace, increased accidents absence, accidents absence, able results, harm “clear present”,