The Portrayal of Reputation (Socrates)
During the Periclean Age, at a time when Athens was at its imperial and cultural peak, reputation was a highly regarded attribute of the Athenian citizen. Individuals who held a high level of reputation were given prominent statuses and enviable positions throughout the city-state. The philosopher, Socrates, believed that reputation did not stand solid on the grounds of validity. In Plato’s The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates questioned many of “those who [held a high] reputation,”(22a) as he wished to determine what subjected these particular individuals to such a enamoured lifestyle . He disappointingly discovered that their knowledge was in fact quite minimal. Socrates took it upon himself to interview individuals deemed as “nearly most deficient” and found that their knowledge surpassed their hierarchal counterparts in society. Socrates tries to explain in his apology that reputation should not be based on material things or the status of oneself, but instead, on the moral righteousness of the individual. In doing so, Socrates earned a poor reputation for himself as he exposed those whom were deemed high status to be the most ignorant and bigoted individuals of the society. This provoked Socrates to qu
As Socrates would put it, those believed to have the highest reputation were found to unequipped to challenge his knowledge. During the Periclean Age in Athens; politicians and poets were perceived as men with great knowledge, as Socrates slowly began questioning how wise these men truly were it became apparent that he was much wiser than them. Socrates states during his apology, after an engaging conversation with a reputed wise man, “I am wiser than this man; it is likely that neither of us knows anything worthwhile, but he thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas when I do not know, neither do I think I know; so I am likely to be wiser than he to this small extent, that I do not think I know what I do not know.” In saying this, he stated that he did not know anything, while the other man saying he did, clearly showed that Socrates was in small way wiser because he was not ignorant to the fact that he did not know anything while the other man was. With this, Socrates destroys the reputation of a credited wise man, and in doing so, destroys a part of his own reputation while exposing the truth. A predicament is then presented to Socrates, either destroy his own reputation to seek the truth the Delphi foretold or to stop and forever wonder. Socrates was not satisfied with not knowing more and more about the oracle’s vision, so he decided to speak with the great poets, at the risk of devaluing his reputation even more, of the city-state in hopes they could challenge his wisdom. Socrates very early soon discovers that most of them were written not with structure but inspirational talent. Socrates explains that the poets “thought themselves very wise men in other respects, which they were not.” This again was seen as a distinct advantage over the poets and further thrashed Socrates’ reputation. After examining men with so-called established reputations in Athens, Socrates was saddened to discover that not one of these men possessed wisdom greater than he. That of course did not stop him from discoursing with other citizens that were deemed wise. Socrates believed that reput
Some topics in this essay:
Sir Athenian,
Athens Socrates,
Age Athens,
Socrates Socrates,
Apology Socrates,
Instead Socrates,
believed reputation,
socrates believed reputation,
socrates believed,
athens socrates,
social status,
socrates tried,
athenian citizen,
difficult avoid,
lower reputation,
Periclean Age,
periclean age athens,
wiser socrates,
reputation found,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1433
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The Portrayal of Reputation (Socrates) Professional Papers: |
Join Now
(Credit Card)
|
Join Now
(Online Check)
|
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)
|
CUSTOMER SERVICES
| |
|