Personal, social and political aspects of Roman baths
The Romans expanded upon the Greek concept of the bath to create an elaborate architectural masterpiece that has been described as a “microcosm of life.” The first Roman encounter with these phenomena is in the fourth century before Christ; they were established and reserved for the private use of the very wealthy. Eventually, in the second century BC, baths became more common, growing both in size and number; they also evolved from a private privilege to a leisure enjoyed by all of the people alike. As baths became more prevalent in society, a change in design and location of buildings in towns, and rooms in houses, was required. Although the structural and technological features of baths are important to the development of Roman architecture, the true significance of baths lies in the cultural influence they had on the personal, social and political aspects of life. The baths of the ancients were small, private and dingy; the attitude toward the bath was one of duty rather than one of luxury. In a letter, Seneca the Younger wrote of the bath of Scipio Africanus; he commented that Scipio’s bathing area was small and dimly lit. Unfortunately, archaeologists have not found any evidence of these early baths.
time and generations, attitude toward this activity evolved into one of extravagance and with it the concept of the size, style, and function matured and expanded. The bath began as a sitz-bath (hip bath) in the fourth century BC, but in the second century the bathing area was enlarged by the addition of the hot bath (caldarium), warm bath (tepidarium), and the cold bath (frigidarium). Finally, in the first century BC sweating rooms (laconicum) and windows were added. Looking at the development of the Stabian Baths of Pompeii (ill. 1), one can see an example of such a transformation. The original baths, dating from the fourth century BC, consisted of a row of sitz-baths found on the north side of the sports grounds (palaestra), a dressing room (apodyterium) and a latrine. The caldarium, tepidarium and apodyterium were added in the late second century BC to the eastern side of the palaestra. The baths were enlarged one last time, when the circular sweating room was added, around 80 BC. The function of the Roman bath surpassed that of its practical purpose; it also served as an escape from the trials of everyday life. The baths have been described as a miniature town (ill. 3), but with an essential difference – they did not contain the “less desirable realities of the real world.” Indeed they were magical retreats. Upon entering the grounds one encounters enormous rooms (i.e., Domitian’s Natatio) magnificently decorated with mosaics, fountains, archways and sculpture. “Everyone thinks himself impoverished and distressed unless the walls of his bath area sparkle with large and costly stone work, unless the vaulted roof is covered with glass, unless (floors were of) Thasian marble, once a rare sight even in a temple, …unless the water pours out of silver faucets…” The patron could partake of many varied activities ranging from wrestling in the palaedra, to strolling in the garden, or receiving a massage. “…the more muscular types are exercising and swinging about lead weights in their hands, …the un-athletic fellow, one satisfied with a low-class rub-down, …a ballplayer comes along
Some topics in this essay:
Domitian’s Natatio,
Baths Carcalla”,
,
Scipio Africanus,
Roman Empire,
Baths Trajan,
Baths Pompeii,
Stabian Baths,
Baths Carcalla,
BC Ultimately,
century bc,
perimeter wall,
baths trajan,
stabian baths,
fourth century,
swimming pool,
fourth century bc,
wall baths,
hot air,
architecture design,
giant baths,
perimeter wall baths,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1439
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
CUSTOMER SERVICES
| |
|