Shane Warne Drug issue

On the 22nd of February, The Australian Cricket Board (ACB) Anti-Doping Committee suspended Shane Warne from all cricket played under the sponsorship of the ACB and his state association for 12 months, effective from 10 February, 2003. He tested positive for the drug diuretics just before the beginning of the World cup and was taken out of th

Shane Warne is guilty of drug taking weather he knew diuretics were banned or not. Being a famous cricketer, Shane Warne should be responsible for knowing what drugs are banned and what he is consuming. The 12-month suspension is adequate because there is no evidence showing the drugs taken by Shane Warne would improve his game, yet he should have know the substance was banned. It is quoted in one of the articles, “even if Warne did take steroids- and there is no evidence that he did- how could these have possibly enhanced his performance? You don’t need to be strong to be a good slow bowler.” Warne got off lightly by receiving a 12-month suspension rather than the 2-year suspension.

Shane Warne’s one-year suspension was not totally inadequate. The suspension allowed the Australian Cricket board anti-doping committee to keep its creditability for its drug policy by following laws they had. There is no evidence to show that Shane Warne would have advantage over his compe

Some topics in this essay:
Shane Warne, Shane Warne’s, Warne Australian, Cricketers Century, Warne Australia’s, shane warne, Australian Cricket, World Cup, 12-month suspension, performance enhancing, shane warne’s, world cup, Anti-Doping Committee, tested positive drug, performance enhancing drugs, australian cricket board, australian cricket, cricket board, totally inadequate, australian hero, anti-doping committee, warne australian hero, shane warne australian,