Cooperative learning- pros and cons
Cooperative learning is a very useful tool to use in schools, when used correctly and in appropriate settings. According to Kagan (1995), “One mission of schools, these proponents say, is to prepare students for the real world” (p. 68). There are many types of groupings including cooperative learning, collaborative learning and ability groupings, which all can all differ in learning outcomes. According to many researchers, high achievers may be at a disadvantage for many reasons including if the grades are evenly distributed, which may result in some ‘free loading’ by some students. Cooperative learning can be successfully executed in a grade five to eight classroom by merely following the five elements of cooperative learning (Sokal, 2003, p. 46). There are many types of groupings used in classrooms that can result in both positive and negative learning outcomes. According to Panitz (1996, p.1), “Cooperative learning is defined by a set of processes which help people interact together in order to accomplish a specific goal or develop an end product which is usually content specific. It is more directive that a collaborative system of governance and closely controlled by the teacher. Wh
Cooperative learning is a very effective learning tool for all learners when it is successfully used. To successfully use cooperative learning, one may use the five elements of cooperative learning. According to Sokal (2003, p. 46), the five elements of cooperative learning include positive interdependence, individual accountability, face to face interaction, group heterogeneity and interpersonal skill development and scaffolding. There are many positive outcomes of cooperative learning according to Sokal (2003, p. Many researchers and teachers believe that cooperative learning may put high achievers at a disadvantage for learning. Work may not be evenly distributed in the group resulting in the low achievers catching a ‘free ride’, especially when they are marked as a group. It is also a lot of work for the teacher, organizing and planning the activity. Teachers also may struggle with the feeling of loosing control over the class, especially when it is more student centered. Also, the research today is not clear how cooperative learning affects high achievers and this may discourage many teachers from utilizing this effective teaching tool. ile there are many mechanisms for group analysis and introspection the fundamental approach is
Some topics in this essay:
According Panitz,
According Sokal,
According Kagan,
cooperative learning,
Learning Cooperative,
elements cooperative learning,
five elements cooperative,
sokal 2003,
five elements,
‘free ride’,
learning experience,
elements cooperative,
sokal 2003 46,
learners including achievers,
achievers disadvantage,
eight classroom,
ability groupings,
according sokal,
according sokal 2003,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 849
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Cooperative learning- pros and cons Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|