To start with there are two basic branches of logic. The first deals with finding certainty from the evidence presented and is called deductive logic. The second tries to find the most likely outcome to the evidence presented and is called inductive logic. Both of these processes can further be d

So how do you find truth? Additionally, again there can be another distinction made within logic that separates it into either standard or non standard logic. Since we are concerned with finding the most certain truth from the evidence presented we will concern ourselves with explaining standard logic. The main difference with this distinction of standard and non standard logic lies with the assumptions. In standard logic there are two laws that have to be followed. The Law of the Excluded Middle asserts that the statement has to be either true or false. While the Law of Non Contradiction states that no statement can both be true and false. With these laws, standard logic can break down any problem into individual statements that are either true or false. These statements can then be identified as either a premises or a conclusion that can become the evidence for a given argument. This evidence, depending on it’s inter relational complexity can then be used to formally diagram the problem and solve whether the argument is either true or false. Knowing how to find what is true and false with this structured process allows us to solve any problem that we might face.

ivided into Formal or Informal logic. When logic has been described as formal, it means that evidence has been broken down into a symbolic language that can make evaluations easier. Informal means that the evidence has been separated into premises and conclusions but has not been converted from the English form.

Now we can break down a given problem into its most basic pieces and even group those pieces together. We now have to rebuild the problem using these newly separated pieces into a form that can discover truth. In standard logic this means building arguments. An argument is made up of statements that have been presented as evidence in an attempt to establish another statement. It is important to al

Some topics in this essay:
Law Contradiction, Rex Frisbee, , Conclusion Rex, False Rex, Formal Informal, standard logic, Standard Logic, true false, Excluded Middle, premises conclusions, Premise Rex, dogs tails, rex dog, statements true, deductive logic, assumptions standard, assumptions standard logic, dogs tails rex, ‘rex dog’, law contradiction, ex dogs tails, statement true false, tails rex dog/rex,