In reading The Marriage of Figaro, it was evident that citizens, especially the lower class, greatly desired control of some political power. They felt locked into a world of which they had no control and the reasoning lied distinctly in the social and legal aspects of the society. They felt that equality under these terms would in turn bring them freedom. “Declaration of the Rights of Man” and “Declaration of the Rights of Women” pleaded the government to allow all men and women, despite their class and ownership, the right to take part in what affected them through the government. Their idea was a democ

As far as an ideal state, I believe the French were a lot closer in their principles of a democracy. My observations of their failure were not the result of a mistake in the overall plan, but existed in a problem with its execution. Communism, from my experience has never resulted in any positive outcomes. This is largely due to the failure of humanity to subdue ones personal interest to the fate of others on a massive scale. This has yet to occur and I personally am not convinced it is achievable. Therefore, I find communism in its ideal state to fail miserably. I may have a personal attraction to the idea of a democratic society being ideal simply because that is all I have been accustomed to in my lifetime. In conclusion, I deduce the ideal state is what ever accustoms itself to the citizens of the culture and society best.

racy; a government controlled by the people rather than the person. This, the lower class hoped, would grant the freedom to own property; the basis of social equality.

Communism as defined by Marx has never been tested. The Russians were the first experimentation

Some topics in this essay:
Rights Women”, Nor Russians, French French, , Marriage Figaro, Carl Marx, Fathers Sons, social equality, Rights Man”, equality social, lower class, “declaration rights,