“Slavery, criminal justice, lynchings, and capital punishment are historically closely intertwined in the United States. Texas is no exception.”

From 1819 to 1923 Texas executed convicts through local communities and individual counties, and execution was done by hanging. Then in 1924 executions fell under the jurisdiction of the state, and in that same year, Texas switched from the rope to the electric chair to appease concerns that prisoners were being treated inhumanely. In the two decades following World War II, there was a decline in executions mainly due to a heightened awareness about injustice and inequity during the civil rights movement. Apprehensions concerning the unfair application of the death penalty were addressed in a landmark decision in 1972, Furman vs. Georgia. In this case, the Supreme Court concluded in a five to four decision that capital punishment “as was then administered, was arbitrary and capricious…and opened the door to discriminatory practices” (408 U.S. 238 [1972]). It felt that current sentencing guidelines violated the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, and Fourteenth Amendment, whi

Some topics in this essay:
Chair Needle, Halperin Death, Punishment Texas, Harris County, Supreme Court, Roy Bean, Halperin Texas, Justice FBI, Criminal Appeals, Dianne Clements, death penalty, capital punishment, frontier mentality, death row, legal representation, harris county, counterpunch 3, support death penalty, pro-death penalty, poor legal, shlachter 1, poor legal representation, halperin texas 1, convicted raping white, court criminal appeals,