Discussion of Human Nature in A Man For All Seasons
When faced with a situation, a person might rise against a challenge in hopes of defending his own values and beliefs. Sometimes, while defending ones own beliefs, he risks causing himself great personal loss or distress. This is evident in Robert Bolt’s play, A Man For All Seasons, where Sir Thomas More faces his challenge by giving his life for what he believes in. He refuses to sign the Act of Supremacy, declaring the marriage between King Henry and Ann Boelyn legitimate and legal. Thomas Cromwell has no personal values to defend. He, being a loyal servant to the King, adopts the values of King Henry as his own. Richard Rich, in a much similar fashion, follows almost every decree of Cromwell. Rich, being the young man that he is, is still searching for his own values and beliefs, so he is greatly influenced by a powerful man such as Cromwell. Ironically, Sir Thomas More is the only character of the three to have positive moral values, and is the only one to be killed in the play for believing in them. Thomas Cromwell is a man who can set aside his own values to obey those of another. In this case, his values become those of King Henry. Henry will tell Cromwell to do something, and whether Cromwell believes in it or not, wil
More: And so it must remain. (pg 96) Cromwell: But, Gentlemen of the Jury, there are many kinds of silence. Consider first the silence of a man when he is dead. Let us say we go into the room where he is lying; and let us say it is in the dead of night—there’s nothing like darkness for sharpening the ear; and we listen. What do we hear? Silence. What does it betoken, this silence? Nothing. This is silence, pure and simple. But consider another case. Suppose I were to draw a dagger from my sleeve and make to kill the prisoner with it, and suppose their lordships there, instead of crying out for me to stop or crying out for help to stop me, maintained their silence. That would betoken! It would betoken a willingness that I should do it, and under the law they would be guilty with me. So silence can, according to circumstances, speak. Consider, now, the circumstances of the prisoner’s silence. The oath was put to good and faithful subjects up and down the country and they had declared His Grace’s title to be just and good. And when it came to the prisoner he refused. He calls this silence. Yet is there a man in this court, is there a man in this country, who does not know Sir Thomas More’s opinion of the King’s title? Of course not! But how can that be? Because this silence betokened—nay, this silence was not silence at all but most eloquent denial. (pg 152) More: This is true; and then you said—
Some topics in this essay:
Sir Thomas,
Gentlemen Jury,
Thomas More’s,
Blessed Cross,
Master Secretary,
Richard Rich,
Cromwell Rich,
Thomas Cromwell,
Norfolk Rich,
,
sir thomas,
richard rich,
human nature,
own life,
king henry,
moral values,
cromwell rich,
own values,
thomas cromwell,
silence betoken,
own values beliefs,
values king henry,
silence betoken silence,
sir thomas challenge,
change more’s words,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1828
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Discussion of Human Nature in A Man For All Seasons Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|