First Speaker: The term censor is derived from the Latin word, census meaning to assess. Each case of censorship is different depending on individual circumstances. Most cases of censorship undermine established government, religion or morals. Censorship is a tool used by governments and communities to protect, among other things, the good character of the society we live in.

There are many who feel that censorship is a good thing in some circumstances. For example, in some European countries propagating information deemed to be racist is illegal. Governments seek to prevent people from advocating ideas, which are deemed damaging to society. There are two answers to this. The first is that you can't allow those in power to impose "good" censorship, without also enabling them to impose "bad" censorship. To impose any form of censorship a government must have the ability to monitor and thus restrict communication. There are already criticisms that the anti-racism censorship in many European countries is hampering legitimate historical analysis of events such as the Second World War.

-Why do you think that the ex-presidents, that you mentioned, broke the law by using censorship?

-If there were censorship, don’t you think that journalist wouldn’t exaggerate the news or make it negative?

-If there were no censorship how do you think that the Mexican community would have reacted when they found out what their presidents did?

Some topics in this essay:
Speaker Retaking, Affirmative Speaker, Third Speaker, World War, Cross Examination, , kids growing, censorship legal, kids growing faster, -if censorship, worry governmental, mexican community, growing faster, mexican society, european countries,