Questions to an inspector calls
In act one we have the exposition: a rich businessman's daughter is going to marry a rich businessman's son and the Birlings are celebrating this engagement in quite a formal manner. In this moment a police inspector comes to investigate a suicide committed by a young girl. During the first act he finds out that this girl was employed in Mr Birling's company and then fired for trying to get more wages. The inspector behaves quite unusual when preventing Mr Birling's son and coming son-in-law from watching a photograph shown to Mr Birling. After finding out the circumstances of Mr Birling firing the girl he finds out that Sheila, Mr Birling's daughter, is also involved in the tragic story of Eva Smith because Sheila had forced another employer to fire Eva again for Eva's not being friendly enough. Are the aims and methods of the Inspector those of the usual policemen? Explain. The aims and methods of the inspector are for sure not those of a usual policeman because a normal policeman would not investigate a suicide case for simply not having enough time for investigating such a thing which is obviously no crime. Investigating a su
I think the author represents the inspector. I think so because this is the only explanation for him writing such a drama. The author wants the reader to think about the responbility of people even if they aren't guilty in legal sense. He wants to make clear peoples' dependence on so called more important people and people with more influence. I also think he wants to accuse employees' social rights in Great Britain at the beginning of the 20th century. He does that by using a - for our today's view - small reason for having the employer Mr Birling discharge Eva Smith. The dependence on people with more influence is clearly shown by having Sheila just say one word to make the fashion shop owner discharge the so called Eva. With Gerald's affair with Sheila he shows the arrogance of rich people towards poor people and with Mrs Birling's denying Eva's trying to get welfare for having a baby makes clear the not existing moral in the upper class. All in one it just must be the inspector who is represented by the author. Otherwise the author wouldn't have written the drama if he had wanted to justify the Birling family's behaviour. The discovery that the inspector wasn't a real policeman makes a big difference to Mr and Mrs Birling. They were just worrying about their position in society for the case that the inspector made public the results of his investigation. But at the end they have found out that the inspector isn't a policeman and that makes them indifferent towards the whole affair. They are glad not to be legally punishable for their behaviour towards Eva Smith and therefore do not care about any moral consequences they should care about. To Sheila and Gerald it makes a big difference because they have found out that there is not any trust between them any more after Gerald's confessing to having had an affair with the so called Eva Smith. For Eric it makes a big difference, too, because he knows that his parents who in any cas
Some topics in this essay:
Homework English,
Smith Eric,
Sheila Eric,
,
Inspector Birling,
Eva Gerald's,
Eva Smith,
Eva Smith's,
Sheila Gerald,
Birling Gerald,
eva smith,
changed attitude,
legal sense,
inspector wasn't,
makes difference,
aims methods inspector,
policeman makes,
guilty legal,
arrogant towards,
inspector's behaviour,
position society,
inspector wasn't real,
methods inspector usual,
discovery inspector wasn't,
fashion shop owner,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1312
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Questions to an inspector calls Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|