Critical Analysis of The New Language by Charles Handy

The essay continues, indicating that organizations used to be similar to a machine, able to design, measure, and control. It has transformed away from machine to a form of network. The organizational language is no longer engineering and management, but politics. The essay then is divided into three parts: The Language of Politics, A Distributed Leadership, and The Necessary Attributes.

The author indicates that things have changed and so has the language in the organization. Words are rephrased to be more political, such as “options” instead of “plans” and “possi

I agree that our workforce is made up of a more distributed environment. No longer is there only one main person working on a single project, but a crew of individuals working side by side for a common purpose. Leaders today need to inspire this group of people and not just dictate what needs to be done. Leaders are like the “glue” that holds the group together. The glue is made up of a “sense of common identity, linked by a common purpose and fed by an infectious energy and urgency.” A leader is a facilitator that monitors the group and only interferes when things are not heading in the correct path.

ble” instead of “perfect.” It further describes the meaning of subsidiarity, earned authority, and virtuality. In the subsidiarity paragraph, I agree with the concept that the “higher-order body should not assume responsibilities that could and should be exercised by a lower-order body.” It is holding individuals accountable for their own actions.

Some topics in this essay:
Distributed Leadership, Language Politics, Age Paradox, Business School, Charles Handy’s, , love people, paragraph agree, leader attribute, individuals accountable, common purpose, discipline requires, earned authority, passion job, distributed leadership, language politics,