Should the Internet Be Censored?
One of the latest media inventions is internet. Because it offers a lot of updated information, people prefer to deal with internet more than other media such as TV or radio. Nowadays billions of people all over the world have access to the internet, simply, through a dial-up connection. Also, everybody is able to create his/her homepage on the web and upload almost everything into his/her web site. For example, people decided to end racism want to censor racist language on the internet. Many feminists want to censor pornography because they believe that it represents women as objects. Therefore, everyone wants to ban something. However, by restricting the flow of information, people cannot make a true decision because they cannot recognize the good ideas from the bad ones. In short, the internet should not be censored because firstly, there is nobody that can determine which sites should be banned or allowed, and secondly, censorship is not the right way to combat this threat to civility. Before creation of the World Wide Web, in bulletin board systems, e-mail, and newsgroups, the internet has been a place for fanatics such as pornographers, adolescent male, and other people who enjoy in transferring the offensive data. B
The article goes on to dispute this by arguing that if this idea was right, because evil speech has been attacked for a thousand years, evil speech would have been conquered long time ago. In summary, there is nobody having authority to decide instead of all the people around the world. If ISPs try to censor the internet because there are some web pages that are not suitable for the children or schools we will have an internet that is nice just for the children. Maybe after censoring the sites because of the children the government decides to change the internet to a kindergarten. Also,, as an adult, I know when I go to a library and sit on the computer what I must do. For example, when I want to research about a topic for my English 102 course I never type *Porn* in the search text title. Therefore, I know where and what time I should use which web sites. In addition, if somebody does not find some materials, he/she can find it in another ISP. There is a lot of ISP companies in each country that offer full access to the internet. In brief, I believe that censoring a web site is not worthwhile. Moreover, after thousand years good speech has not been able to prevail over the evil speech. D. Brandeis is quoted as saying in the Censorship is Essential to an Open Society: It is simple to find out the expression of more speech, not less (Censorship Is Harmful to an Open Society, 1) is not true because the good speech was not able beat the evil speech. In brief, censoring the web pages is the only way to combat with the offensive sites because of the weakness points in the more speech not less idea. Raymond Smith refers to a cartoon that recently appeared in the newspapers. Through the doorway, a mother calls out to her teenager-who is surrounded by high-tech equipment-"I hope you're not watching sex stuff on the Internet!" To which her son replies, "Naw, I'm getting it on TV!" (208)
Some topics in this essay:
Anti-Defamation CyberPatrol,
Harmful Society,
Wide Web,
,
Essential Society,
CDA II,
Library Evanston,
Raymond Smith,
Naw I'm,
ISP ISP,
web sites,
web pages,
evil speech,
determine sites,
sites banned,
determine sites banned,
harmful society,
ideas bad,
offensive web,
censorship harmful,
censorship harmful society,
sites banned allowed,
censorship combat,
censorship essential society,
offensive web pages,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1330
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Should the Internet Be Censored?
Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|
Example Essays Home
