In conclusion, if it were not for the Europeans, the Aztec society would have lasted longer because of their system of government, system of labor, and more independent common class. The Aztec system of government was more decentralized, making the probability of a rebellion less likely than a more centralized system of government. The Aztec system of labor made its workers more independent because they were not considered slaves, making it less likely for the system to be overthrown by one of the most populated classes in the civilization. Lastly, the Aztec commoners had more rights and freedom than the Incan commoners, therefore making it more likely for the Aztec civilization to survive longer than the Incan civilization. Survival is just like Charles Darwin said, "In the struggle for survival, the fittest always win...”

Not only was the Aztec government a simple system, but the social classes were simple as well. At the top of the social scale was the hereditary nobility. Second on the scale were the commoners. Third on the scale were the Indentured workers. At the very bottom of the scale were the slaves. The Incas illustrated a similar system, except for the fact that they had a mita-labor force, instead of an indentured labor force. The mita-labor force was a system where instead of paying tribu

Some topics in this essay:
Europeans Aztecs, Europeans Aztec, Ayllu Incan, , Aztecs Europeans, America Aztecs, Lastly Aztec, Lastly Aztecs, Aztecs Incas, system government, Charles Darwin, system labor, incan civilization, incan society, common class, civilization lasted, aztec society, independent common, aztec civilization, independent common class, government system labor, social class, system labor independent, system government system, lasted incan civilization,