Oh! The Morality: An Argument on Reproductive Cloning
When Ian Wilmut and his colleagues at the Roslin Institute announced that they had the successful cloning of a sheep from the mammary cells of an adult female, the world reacted with intense emotion. The arrival of Dolly made it abundantly clear that the possibility of cloning humans was not far behind, if behind at all. Some view this possibility with anticipation, some with fear, and others with grief; which leave questions burning in our minds of when, where and how, but perhaps the most pertinent, is this right?! After a careful evaluation of essays, documents, and books pertaining to reproductive cloning, I have concluded that under current conditions, reproductive cloning is impermissible because of its hazardous consequences. However, I argue that if and when safety is no longer an immediate concern, then reproductive cloning will be morally permissible. I do this by initially demonstrating the risks involved with cloning procedures, and then by rejecting two popular arguments opposing cloning, and conclude by briefly discussing beneficial opportunities of cloning.The successful cloning of Dolly, the sheep, illuminates that we could potentially clone human beings. However, the highly complicated and hazardous process of n
“The cloned individual will be saddled with a genotype that Further studies have shown that there are other biological conditions that pertain to the genetic age of the DNA of the donor-cell nucleus that is injected into the enucleated oocyte, which further complicate the morality of cloning. One theory of cell aging claims that cells follow a stipulated genetic recipe and only divide a certain number of times before dying. The aging of the cells is controlled by telomeres, the ends of chromosomes with repeating sequences of DNA on them, which become increasingly shorter each time the cell divides. After a given amount of time, the cell can no longer divide, and ultimately, dies. Another theory of aging states that cells age through random damage to DNA, as it interacts with elements inside and outside of the body. These can include external environmental elements such as, ionizing radiation and chemicals found in cigarette smoke, as well as internal elements like hydroxyl radicals, which are waste products of cell metabolism. These can cause mutations in the sequences of base pairs that compose the DNA molecule. Expert Walter Glannon explains that, certain possibilities were not really open to one, and so one I have reviewed two other objections to cloning that also deem it immoral. One such argument made by Leon L. Kass claims that cloning will lead to an eventual deficiency of our social and cultural institutions, that we will lose a normal understanding of what father, mother, sibling and grandparent are. Furthermore, he states that, other efforts to shape that new life after the original or at least to view the child with the original version always firmly in
Some topics in this essay:
Irreversible DNA,
University Hawaii,
Michael Tooley,
Ian Wilmut,
Leon Kass,
Roslin Institute,
Barry Bonds,
Walter Glannon,
reproductive cloning,
delayed twin,
morally permissible,
cloning morally permissible,
cloned baby,
run marathon,
cloning morally,
identical genetic copy,
lead eventual,
surprise world,
reproductive cloning morally,
morality cloning,
walter glannon,
cloned baby healthy,
ian wilmut colleagues,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2347
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
|