of controversy and strong opinions both for and against its practice. At the present time

abortions are legal in Canada, however, there are groups of people who would like for

this to change. The arguments range from moral ethics, religious teachings, and even to

questionable parts of the law which may debate allowing abortion. On the other side of

the coin the supporters of abortion can use many arguments which debate the

characteristics of the fetus –such as its ability to feel pain or whether or not it is “alive”--,

as well it is debated that most women who actually do have abortions did use some form

of birth control during sex --it merely didn’t work ,and the reality becomes that if a

person wants to have an abortion to begin with they do not want to have that child so they

would suffer a hard life – there is also the situation of rape. Both sides provide very

strong and debateable opinions, which leads to a frenzy of controversy and at times civil

unrest. Ultimately my consensus on the subject is that I myself would never wish for the

mother of my own child to have an abortion, however I

morals be forced on the rest of society. In actuality a poll conducted in 1998 stated that

to a life it would still not have the right to use the pregnant mother’s body against the

which is based to a large extent on personal opinion. As a result opinions will continue to

the sense that the pregnant mother and her rights would not be a factor in such a case.

Some topics in this essay:
Committee Ethics, , Canada Canada, War II, Prime Minister, practice abortion, nervous system, hard life, birth control, fetus developed nervous, receive proper care, developed nervous system, canadian law, arguments practice abortion, rights mother, living organism, developed nervous, arguments practice, common argument,