The employer’s moral decision of monitoring employee’s email is based on protecting their companies. I believe they base this decision due to past experiences and litigations. This ensured that there would always be an eye on what the employee was accomplishing during the workday. In this issue the employer sacrifice ethics for money.

The Utilitarian perspective here as far as I can see is that the employer’s action to monitor their employee’s email provides the greatest good for the company in that it protects them from unfavorable activities. But the number of people affected by a decision in this matter is clearly huge. In another survey conducted in 1998, “98% of all companies with more than 1,000 employees have Internet access, and 45% of businesses with 20 to 99 employees are online. For many workers, e-mail is replacing the telephone as the preferred means of communication.”

Employers of businesses provide equipment to employee’s in the workplace to assist them in accomplishing their day-to-day tasks. This equipment is for work-related tasks only not for non-work related tasks. They monitor email that enters their system by using software that that records information and or activity on a computer and then sends the information to the person or company that installed it. Companies often install these programs on the systems in their offices to monitor employee usage. This helps ensure that employees are not surfing the web or writing personal emails when they should be working. This benefits the employer by abling them to prevent for example, hostile work environment by circulating racial or ethnic jokes on the comp

Some topics in this essay:
Act ECPA, Business Ethics, , Windows NT, Microsoft Outlook, private email, Hawaii Division, email internet, monitor email, employee’s email, viewed intended recipient, email internet services, feel private, monitoring employee’s email, sexually explicit, viewed intended, monitoring employee’s, private viewed intended, intended recipient, hostile environment,