Science has little concern with the abstract value of something or its possible abstract origin or purpose, but science doesn’t daydream. It is forever bound to the world by its very nature. Science has rhyme and usually reason; given sufficient background on the part of the studier, the path its leads down is straight and easy to follow. Science explains things by leading you by the hand down streets of research and findings to a neat,

Science in its way of explanation devoid of GOD holds back the soul and limits the reaches of the mind. A room with no air does not allow for breathing, as something empty to the source of beauty can not praise it. Science is a way of thinking on a level with the earth, to explore its dimensions in order to understand it and make it known. Religion stands on the earth but looks to the sky to know that which eludes the mind using the soul.

Creation, nature, things we spoke at length about. What should have dominion over these? Scientific observation or spiritual appreciation? I feel the latter is the greater. I believe nature should be enjoyed purely and utterly. As science leaves no room for beauty so beauty leaves no room for science. You will never finds beauty in a test tube or on a slide. Appreciation of nature requires much more than a mere knowledge of its parts and the transcendence it gives rise to can not be contained in the mind, it must spill over into the soul. I was in a museum one day admiring a painting, standing three or four feet from I had a knowledge of the space within the frame that filled me with deep appreciation. As I moved closer I found in the strokes of the brush and the movement of the paint, the great time and effort invested by the artist, and I felt a sense of kinship with he whose gift filled my eyes. As I stepped closer still I became almost bothered by all the individual strokes of the brush, I began to wonder if there was any set relation that they bore to one another, if I could perhaps create a formula for duplicating this, for a tree, or a cloud, or a drop of sunlight. And I lost sight of the painting, timid beauty fled before my growling study of the work. And that picture was nature.

well organized conclusion. This destination does its part however large or small, to leave one more thing explained. In this way it offers concrete solutions to problems with little room for interpretation. It can tell you where it thinks we came from but will never tell you absolutely It can tell you how it thinks we started but can’t tell you definitely, and can’t tell you why. It can’t give concrete answers to some questions, the questions of existence. These very things are the bane of science, questions that seem without answers or answers without co

Some topics in this essay:
Seeing Sagan’s, , Paradoxically Hawking, GOD Sagan, weak minds, nature science, concrete evidence, god leads believe, god leads, presence beyond, leads believe, absence god, wonder science, can’t tell, strokes brush,