Thesis: Nothing in the Constitution disallows random urinalysis requirement for students participating in interscholastic athletics. However, such testing of school students has not been proven beneficial to the students or the sports programs.

A. Court views on Drug Testing of Student Athletes

A. Tests do not actually detect all drugs

V. Relations between student-teacher, parents

Against Drug Testing of Student Athletes

Nothing in the Constitution allows random urinalysis testing for students participating in interscholastic athletics. Such testing of students has not been proven beneficial to the students or the sports programs. More and more schools are testing student athletes for drug use, and so far, they are divided on the question of when and why schools may test student athletes for drugs. Laws vary from state to state, in part because some state constitutions provide more protection than others do for students’ privacy right

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. “The Court set out a three-part test that took into consideration (1) the student’s expectation of privacy, (2) the nature of the drug test, and (3) the school’s interest or reasons for instituting drug testing” (U.M-KC). The Indiana Court of Appeals struck down a school policy of performing drug tests on students participating in athletics and other extracurricular activities (ACLU). The court decided to replace the drug-testing policy with a responsible system of parental notification. The board promises to make the schools a more nurturing place and to return a measure of authority over students to parents, with whom it rightly belongs. Now, school officials who suspect a student of drug abuse will contact the student's parents about the concerns, leaving it to the parents to decide if the student should be tested for drugs or treated medically. Other states such as New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington have also decided to use this method (ACLU).

problems” (DPA,2002). Urine testing is based on an analysis of metabolites associated with the drug in question. Because alcohol, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine all pass through the body within 24-48 hours, leaving no metabolites, marijuana is the only substance that is easily detected with urinalysis. Drugs that have a more significant impact on performance in school, such as alcohol and other illegal drugs, are not effectively tested for with urinalysis (ACLU). Moreover, drug tests such as urinalysis.

money can be put to use in better ways. The Dublin School has hired a full-time drug and alcohol counselor (Talking Pts.). Most schools only have a few students test positive and some see this as stopping the drug problem. It seems to me that they are only helping those stude

Some topics in this essay:
Talking Pts, ACLU Drug, ACLU Moreover, Court Appeals, Athletes Constitution, Univ Missouri, DPA2002 Urine, BDT Internet, United Constitution, Thesis Constitution, drug testing, student athletes, testing student athletes, testing student, drug testing student, using drugs, students participating, testing students, urine samples, drug test, talking pts, students sports programs, extracurricular activities, beneficial students sports, students proven beneficial,