The 5th Amendment
Protection against illegal search and seizure by police and government officials is the basic guarantee given to American citizens by the 4th Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Like most of the rights and freedoms outlined in the Bill of Rights, the 4th Amendment has come under heavy debate about its contents in the past, and will continue to be argued over in the future. In the Bill of Rights, the framers specifically state this freedom; “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effect against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by the Oath of Affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (Maddex, 240) This statement gives a broad view of the specific guarantee, and the following paragraphs will help to further define and explain the conflict over the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. One term that you may be questioning the meaning of is probable cause, because it has been widely used without exactly explaining the definition. It is a situation allowing the police reason to believe that a person sho
Since the Supreme Court justices change with every new Presidential administration, so do the views on different policies that the Court has ruled on in the past. This is why many cases and policies have been overturned because of different views in the Justices who make up a particular administration. For example, during the 1970s the Court was closely divided on which standard to apply. For a while, the balance was favor of the view that searches without warrants are unreasonable, with a few carefully prescribed exceptions. Gradually, the Court broadened its view of allowable exceptions and broadened the scope of those exceptions. Because conservatives and liberals have varying interpretations of the 4th Amendment, there is no doubt that many a debate has been sprung by certain circumstances. For example, there have been various instances around the United States where school students have claimed random testing has violated their right of protection against search and seizure. One of the most famous of these cases is New Jersey vs. TLO. The case involved a 14 year old girl from Piscataway High School in New Jersey. A teacher found TLO smoking in the girls' bathroom, which is illegal since schools are a designated tobacco free zone. The teacher took TLO to the principal's office, where she was questioned by the vice principal. TLO denied the fact that she even smoked, but the assistant principal, Mr. Choplick, ordered her to hand over her purse. Upon inspection, a package of cigarettes, marijuana, rolling paper, and other drug paraphernalia were found in the purse. She was then suspended and charged for drug possession. But that all changed when the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the search of TLO violated the rights guaranteed in the 4th Constitutional Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the case and reversed the lower court decision. In an opinion written by Justice White, the Court first held, importantly, that the Fourth Amendment does apply to student searches conducted by school authorities. (Simpson, Article 2) As you can see, the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution covers a wide scope of topics and situations. Therefore, it has been subjected to much debate over the years, resulting in the interpretations of this right that we all have today. But with the changing views of the Court system and the majority of American citizens, the protection against unlawful search and seizure will most certainly come under scrutiny and debate again in the near future.
Some topics in this essay:
Supreme Court,
Oath Affirmation,
Bill Rights,
Gradually Court,
School Jersey,
Mapp Cleveland,
International Airport,
Amendment Constitution,
Fourth Amendment,
Infotraccom Article,
supreme court,
4th amendment,
probable cause,
search seizure,
bill rights,
exclusionary rule,
illegal search seizure,
unreasonable searches,
searches seizures,
search warrant,
drug testing,
unreasonable searches seizures,
supreme court ruled,
supreme court outlined,
illegally seized evidence,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1915
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The 5th Amendment Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|