Trusts, Monopolies, and Antitrust
In a capitalist market, business monopolies can sometimes develop, and require the intervention of certain legislation. A monopoly is the control of a service or supply of a commodity. Monopolies can also lead to, and promote the power to fix prices and exclude competition. Trusts are also very similar to a monopoly. The main difference between the two is that with a trust, there is a group of trustees, which come together to consolidate one corporation that can eventually lead to the configuration of a monopoly. In the United States the government has enacted antitrust laws to discourage the formation of such monopolies and trusts. The initial antitrust legislation that was enacted in the United States was the Sherman Act of 1890. This law was initially introduced as a result of the attempted consolidation of the Standard Oil Industry by Standard Oil and John D. Rockefeller (Coleridge, 1). Originally states tried to outlaw anticompetitive behavior. The idea was that corporations chartered in one state would not normally hold stock in a corporation in another state. However, this was ineffective, as corporations merely incorporated and expanded into other states. In addition, Samuel Dodd came up with the idea of a trust
Although what AT&T, Microsoft, and Wal-Mart did to form their monopolies was not illegal, some violations within a trust or monopoly are. For example, if two The foremost problem with antitrust laws is that they are so vague businessmen have no way of knowing whether specific actions will be declared illegal until after the fact. The entire structure of antitrust statutes in this country is also a clutter of economic irrationality. It is the product of unrealistic economic theories that originated in the 1890’s and are still being applied in the 21st century. The very existence of these indefinable statutes and contradictory case law can inhibit businessmen from undertaking what could have been sound productive ventures. However, no one will ever know what new products, processes, machines, and cost-saving monopolies failed to come into existence, killed by the Sherman Act before they were ever born. Money, greed, and power are the apparent motives behind a corporate merger or takeover, which later leads to a trust or monopoly. “When a company is the target of a hostile corporate takeover, what its customers, employees or even management think doesn’t matter much. Money talks”(Harrison, 14 ). The leaders responsible for a large industrial consolidation seem to have a disregard for the life of the middle to lower level employees. The tantalizing bi-products of trusts and monopolies make them desirable when the opportunity is available to CEO’s and businessmen. If government regulations do not interfere with a newly created trust or monopoly, the financial benefits can be extensive for those who are involved. One of the most critical problems with antitrust legislation against business consolidation is how it should be applied in the digital age. These applications of the law extend to popular areas of culture including AT&T, Microsoft, and Wal-Ma
Some topics in this essay:
Oil Company,
Angeles York,
,
Act July,
Microsoft Wal-Mart,
Rockefeller Coleridge,
Sherman Act,
trusts monopolies,
Standard Oils’,
antitrust laws,
Samuel Dodd,
Standard Oil,
standard oil,
trust monopoly,
monopolies trusts,
at&t microsoft wal-mart,
microsoft wal-mart,
antitrust legislation,
capitalist market,
company able,
oil company,
standard oil company,
antitrust laws applied,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1271
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Trusts, Monopolies, and Antitrust Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|