Mr. Cimagala wrote many fallacies in his essay, however. In the first paragraph, he writes, “They are now talking now talking about gay or same-sex marriages in the US, Canada and in many parts of Europe. I hope the aberration does not get into our country.” This is a red herring argument. It diverts the reader’s attention from wh

In paragraph six, he is guilty of using appeal to fear when he stated, “Powerful and evil forces are at play. They are out to change the world according to their vision.” Attempting to use this tactic to make people believe what he is saying, he is unsuccessful, as he once again failed to give evidence to back up his claim.

In paragraph two, he commits both fallacies of guilt by association and non sequitur. By associating reproductive health, family planning, etc., with gay marriages, he tries to support his idea that homosexual marriages will be introduced in the Philippines sooner or later. Yet he does not actually prove that the topics are related to each other.

Mr. Cimagala’s comments may be correct or incorrect but his failure to provide evidences regarding his claims makes his entire essay look like an opinion of a homophobic pers

Some topics in this essay:
Canada Europe, Homosexual Persons, Roy Cimagala, Episcopalian Church, , Catholic Church, Doctrine Faith, effects homosexual union, catholic church, harmful effects homosexual, issues regarding homosexuality, homosexual union, harmful effects, using appeal, gay marriages, regarding homosexuality, effects homosexual, episcopalian church, roy cimagala, appeal prejudice,