Anthropologist
Responsibilities of Anthropologists There is much blindness in the way “civilized” people first percieve people of other cultures. Often times this blindness can lead to arrogance. Anthropology has been important for hundreds of years, describing unknown cultures and explaining their histories. Unfortunately, not all of the work or research these anthropologists do can be completely accurate. Researchers such as Napolean A Chagnon abuse not only the culture under question, but all those who follow his work. It is difficult to understand why this type of abuse occurs. There are many explinations why, but the most prevelant being the illusion of superiority. Chagnon was a very crafty man who manipulated his surroundings to get the results he desired. Although supposedly researching the formerly unkonown tribe of the Yanomami, Chagnon essentially changed the history of the Yanomami people, in order to collect information about their past. This is an example of anthropologists abusing his or her power, to further their own career. Chagnon got the results he wanted from the start. Chagnon wanted to describe these people as violent and dangerous in order to get more people interested and make himself seem brave by living with these
“wild” tribes. His descriptions were made from his own point of view, which are certainly tainted, and the worst part is that people who read his work have no idea how biased an opinion he might have. Anthropologists have a responcibility to their research, as well as those who learn from it, to be completely objective. It is disappointing that people get taken advantage of and sometimes led to believe things that make the “reasercher” seem almost mighty. An area of much debate is whether a researcher should intereact or simply observe. Both could have positive or negative results to the people being studied. An argument can be made that the only truly objective way to research a culture is to only observe, and never interact because interacting could change the way people live. A good example of this is the experience of the Yanomami and Chagnon. Chagnon interacted with the Yanomami and eventually brought war and disrespected many religious beliefs they practiced. This could hardly be called objective. An argument could be made using the “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” essay, for the interaction between the researcher and the culture he or she is studying. In “Deep Play” only the most visual details were available to research, and when the man and wife are introduced to the culture it is then that they are able to make significant conclusions. It is not the point of this essay to determine which method of research is the best or most objective, but rather to state the importance of objectiveness, or lack of objectiveness in Anthropology. Jane Tompkins, author of “Indians,” questions the validity of every research, every history book, and every opinion turned fact that has been written. Tompkins believes after researching herself th
Some topics in this essay:
Indians Setteler’s,
Jane Tompkins,
Tompkins Indians,
Yanomami Chagnon,
Balinese Cockfight”,
Napolean Chagnon,
Responsibilities Anthropologists,
Yanomami Anthropology,
Chagnon Chagnon,
Word Count,
anthropologists responcibility,
history book,
truth history,
hear teachers,
yanomami chagnon,
tompkins illustrates,
seemingly true,
jane tompkins,
type abuse,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1197
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Anthropologist Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|