Buddhism
One of the toughest situations a parent could face is watching his or her child slowly pass away from an incurable and painful disease. As time goes on, the child’s only hope for living for perhaps a few weeks or months is by the aid of a life-support system. The doctor has asked the parent if he or she has considered taking the child off the support system, and donating the organs to other children in great need. How do you respond? Do you choose to have your child remain on life-support, or you take the life altering decision of removing him or her and allow your child’s organs to be donated? If I were in such a painful and overwhelming position, I would choose to allow the doctors to remove my child from the life-support system, and to donate my child’s organs to other unhealthy children. I will justify my decision from a Mahayana Buddhist perspective, while explaining the ideas of sila, metta, karuna, dana, and kusala, and I will also account for all the pros and cons of each course of action.Sila means doing good and refraining from doing evil with bodily action and speech. Right View and Right Attitude encourage sila because once you see the truth, you are no longer inclined to use your body or speech for harming y
Metta or lovingkindness meditation cultivates our ability to connect with and care in a rare unconditional way, for others and ourselves. If I were to take my child off life-support, I will inevitably be overcome with a sense of sorrow and a feeling of unforgiveness (Class lecture, Nov.9/01). However, according to metta, our hearts' capacity for patience, acceptance, compassion and forgiveness becomes boundless. With an inner and outer environment of safety our hearts and minds can open fearlessly. The result of this practice is an ever-deepening stillness, from which the truth of life can be recognized clearly. Metta practice is a sturdy foundation for the wisdom practice of insight. The Buddha is quoted in the Metta Sutta: “Just as a mother might protect from harm the son that was her only child, let all-embracing thoughts of love for every living thing be thine. An all-embracing love for all the universe, in all its heights and depth and breadth. An unstinted love, not marred by enmity.” (Sutta-Nip.149) Therefore, if I feel hatred towards my self for my decision, it is most likely to pass, as I had the best interests of my child and other unhealthy children in mind. ourself or other beings (Class lecture, Nov.7/01). You feel responsible; you are not going to misuse your own body or someone else's, or cause harm to other beings intentionally. By removing my child from the life-support system in order to prevent him/her from undergoing a further painful life and by donating his/her organs to another child in need, I won’t be causing harm to the child, but instead giving the chance of life to another human being. I may have caused harm unintentionally, but I did not have the intention to hurt. That's the difference. Genuineness and empathy are central to the practice of karuna. Compassion bubbles up from deep within our hearts. It is a "feeling with" that
Some topics in this essay:
Prajna Sutra,
Nov14/01 Sila,
View Attitude,
Mindfulness Concentration,
,
Metta Sutta,
Mahayana Buddhist,
class lecture,
child life-support,
lecture nov9/01,
life-support system,
class lecture nov9/01,
life human,
child life-support system,
chance life human,
removing child,
taking child,
incurable painful disease,
practice sila,
regrets guilt,
guilt ridden feeling,
mindfulness concentration,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1266
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Buddhism Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|