Animal Experimentaiton..A Look at the Pros and the Cons

There are some advantages to animal experimentation. Conditions for the animals are getting much more humane (Newscientist.com). For example,

A science major, Emma Hockly, and her team of students from Oxford University studied enrichment on mice with Huntington’s disease under three conditions: large cage with nine other mice equipped with toys, a cage with a cardboard tube, and standard cage. Results from motor coordination tests proved that mice with the enriched cages did much better than those with standard cages; they also seemed healthier and happier despite their condition (qtd. in Newscientist.com).

Lab animals are being taught and persuaded to partake in experiments, rather than using coercion (Newscientist.com). Animals will work with the scientists, rather than against them (Newscientist.com). Test results will also be better because the animals aren’t stressed (Newscientist.com). There will also be welfare benefits

due to animals not being sedated or restrained (Newscientist.com).

Despite the advantages of animal experimentation, however, there are drawbacks. In arguments against animal experimentation, people who believe that humans are far better than other animals are committing “specie-ism” (Cothran 69). These arguments are used with sexist and racist conflicts as well (Cothran 69). In arguments against animal experimentation, a standard idea is that if we don’t kill humans to benefit others, we shouldn’t sacrifice animals either (Cothran 69).

veterinary purposes (Cothran 80). Many hundreds of veterinary medicines are produced yearly thanks to animal testing (Cothran 80). Louis Pasteur through his work proves that animal experimentation and different diseases can change science the world over for the better (Cothran 79). He did experiments with cows and their milk (Cothran 79). Before he came up with the concept over pasteurizing milk, milk contained many harmful bacterial substances (Cothran 79).

Vivisection is the practice of experimentation on live animals (PETA). There are many reasons to oppose vivisection (PETA). The Physiological variations amongst rats, rabbits, dogs, cats, pigs, and humans are huge, meaning that not only do animal experiments hurt animals and waste money, they harm and kill people too (PETA). For example, drugs such as thalidomide, zomax, and DES were tested safe on animals, but consequently had fatal results on humans (PETA). Experiments using animals have proven to waste billions of dollars each year (PETA). For example, 90% of all cancers are preventable (PETA). Less than a quarter of NCI’s budget is spent on prevention, most of NCI’s other money goes to animal tests on currently human safe cancer treating drugs (PETA) Animals are not isomorphic wit

Some topics in this essay:
Louis Pasteur’s, Animal Experiments, PETA Substances, Animal Experimentation, Newscientistcom Toxicological, According Dahmer, PETA Xenographs, Louis Pasteur, PETA Physiological, Oxford University, animal experimentation, peta example, cothran 82, cothran 79, research newscientistcom, cons animal, cons animal experimentation, pros cons animal, pros cons, cothran 69, advantages animal experimentation, animals cothran, animals peta, cothran 69 arguments, biomedical research animals,