Legalization of Recreational Drugs
Drug abuse is costly to our society as a whole. There are many debates regarding the use of “recreational” drugs, and the legalization of their use. What defines recreational? Motivational factors are the driving force behind any form of drug use, be it recreational, occasional or social. The Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence (ISDD) has determined that the term “recreational use” implies that drugs have become a part of someone’s lifestyle, even though the user may only take drugs occasionally. “Occasional” refers to the regularity of use. The terms of “recreational” and “occasional” are often associated with the term “social”, which is an even more inaccurate term for describing drug-taking behavior. Social drug taking implies that the motivation for use is pressure from wanting to be a part of a group, or to be considered part of the crowd. The ISDD uses all of these terms, “recreational”, “occasional”, and “social” to describe the motives for taking drugs. Although much of society would not see any reason as acceptable for taking drugs, there are groups who would like to see “recreational” drugs legalized. www.sumpoint.net/~inkapartanen/tekstit/drugs.htm
Since the mid-1990s, the prevalence of lifetime heroin use increased for both youths and young adults. From 1995 to 2002, the rate among youths aged 12 to 17 increased from 0.1 to 0.4 percent; among young adults aged 18 to 25, the rate rose from 0.8 to 1.6 percent. Between 1988 and 1994, the annual number of new users ranged from 28,000 to 80,000. Between 1995 and 2001, the number of new heroin users was consistently greater than 100,000. “Would legalizing drugs really affect large drug dealers or drug cartels in any appreciable way? Drug cartels would still control price and supply even if drugs were legalized in this country. If government set the price for legalized drugs, criminals could undercut the price and supply whatever the government did not supply.” Anderson. Addicts would not be significantly affected by legalization. Financial constraints would still exist, whether the drugs required by the addicts were purchased legally or illegally. Another argument by proponents is that legalizing drugs would reduce the cost of drugs and thus “reduce the supply of drugs flowing to this country. Recent history suggests that just the opposite will take place. When cocaine first hit the United States, it was expensive and difficult to obtain. But when more was dumped into this country and readily available in less expensive vials of crack, drug addiction rose and drug-related crimes rose.” Anderson Drug legalization will reduce drug use – Another pro is the thought that legalizing drugs will make them less appealing, and they will no longer have the appeal they did while illegal. “Those arguing for the legalization of drugs often point to Prohibition as a failed social experiment. But was it? When Prohibition was in effect, alcohol consumption declined by 30 to 50 percent and death from cirrhosis of the liver fell dramatically. One study found that suicides and drug-related arrests also declined by 50 percent. After the repeal of the 18th amendment in 1933, alcoholism rose. So did alcohol-related crimes and accidents. If anything, Prohibition proves the point. Decriminalization increases drug use.” Anderson
Some topics in this essay:
Health NSDOH,
Psychotherapeutics Psychotherapeutics,
Substances Act,
Hepatitis HIV,
Dependence ISDD,
REFERENCE Cocaine,
Anderson Government,
Anderson Drug,
Anderson Addicts,
Substance Act,
recreational drugs,
youths aged,
percent 2002,
youths aged 12,
adults aged,
aged 18,
aged 12,
18 25,
adults aged 18,
aged 18 25,
percent adults,
aged 12 17,
12 17,
percent youths,
percent adults aged,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2339
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Legalization of Recreational Drugs Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|