The nature of intelligence
The concept of intelligence has been explored by different disciplines and scientific movements since many years ago. Despite this, even today, that noble experimental research has been conducted and different theories have appeared around the meaning of intelligence, it is almost impossible for the majority of scientists to consent to a definition about such an abstract notion. Even a traditional determination of the intelligence as the capacity of mental development through experience (Sternberg, 1981, 1982b) is conditionally accepted. So, in order to clarify the nature of intelligence it is useful to introduce three predominant psychological approaches, the psychometrical, the developmental and the information processing. Additionally, the topic of defining intelligence can become much more spherical and integral by focusing firstly in some basic aspects that formulated years ago by pioneers in that subject as Darwin, Galton, Binet, Spearman and others. The idea of natural selection and “survival of the fittest” introduced by Darwin (1888), and adopted by eugenicists, relates the principles of intelligence with senses of human indefectibility, high moral standards and ethnic superi
The opposition to two factor theory of intelligence appears with the multifactor theory introduced by E.L. Thorndike. Thorndike states that there are several brain functions interacting and indicating the nature of intelligence. All these different capacities compose three types of intelligence: social, concrete and abstract intelligence (Aiken, 1987). Furthermore opposition appears through the non general group factors models proposed by Thurstone and Guilford, according to which “intelligence is not a unitary entity, but rather consists of a relatively small number of group factors” as mentioned by Aiken. Guiford’s (1967) structure- of-intellect model analyze the meaning of intelligence by figuring out parameters as the mental process, the test material and the final result of the specific mental process on a particular context. These three basic factors mentioned above, process, test material and result are broken down in five (cognition, memory, divergent thought, convergent thought and estimation), four (figural, typical, semantic and behavioral) and six (units, categories, relations, systems, transformations and implications) sub factors respectively (Aiken, 1987). Another version of a multifactor intellectual model is Vernon’s tree-shaped hierarchical model (1969). According to this model there is a main factor on the tree and the greatest its extent the broader range of behaviors it determines. That basic factor is separated in two group factors named “verbal-educational” and “practical-mechanical-spatial”. Consecutively these two factors are divided in some more minor group sub factors as verbal fluency, numerical ability, creativity ect. An other basic analysis of the function of intelligence is between fluid intelligence gf and crystallized intelligence gc (Cattel, 1963; Horn&Cattel, 1966). A similar bisection (Hebb, 1949) of the operations o
Some topics in this essay:
Developmental Psychologists,
Aiken Guiford’s,
Intelligence Intelligence,
NATURE INTELLIGENCE,
Binet Henri,
Pearson Spearman,
Process Triarchic,
Additionally Sternberg’s,
Binet Terman,
Thorndike Thorndike,
nature intelligence,
aiken 1987,
intelligence according,
mental process,
crystallized intelligence,
fluid intelligence,
concept intelligence,
intellectual growth,
process test material,
factor theory,
test material,
intelligence aiken 1987,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1270
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The nature of intelligence Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|