Pete Rose Should Be in the Hall of Fame
In Jon Saraceno’s article, “Rose’s Wrong Can’t Be Undone (USA Today, 12.16.2002) he defends the1989 decision of Baseball Commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti that banned Pete Rose from Major League baseball for life. The decision followed a legal review that insinuated that Rose placed bets on major league games. Because of this ban, Pete Rose is also ineligible to be inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame. Saraceno’s article may be correct; Pete Rose may be a gambler and not an honest man. However, in my opinion, Rose is an outstanding athlete who deserves to be enshrined in the Hall of Fame. To support my opinion, I will begin with the writer’s statement that “Gambling is baseball’s ultimate sin.” I agree that gambling is morally offensive. It is true that gamblers, like racists, drunks, and abusive husbands, lack integrity. Consequently, there are a number of Hall of Fame individuals who would rate low in the character and integrity areas. The very unlikable Ty Cobb, the drinking and womanizing Babe Ruth, t
Some topics in this essay:
Hall Fame, Pete Rose, Major League, Fame Museum, National League, Finally Saraceno’s, pete rose, hall fame, Pete Rose’s, Bull Durham, Hall Fame-caliber, Sports Illustrated, major league, saraceno’s article, league record, all-time major league, rose ball, rose deserves, chicken costume, baseball players, record career, national league record, national baseball hall, pete rose deserves, pete rose ball,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 709
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Pete Rose Should Be in the Hall of Fame Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
 |
All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2008 ExampleEssays.com DMCA HMS
|
|