1. "Coma and persistent vegetative state" Http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article1921394859.html. Medical

Consequently, the first point of debate would be whether there is ever a time that AN&H can ethically be withdrawn. For those that emphasize God's 'miraculous interventions' and our inability to predict the future, possibly the answer would be "No." We should remain true to our moral convictions and act accordingly when it comes to patients with PVS and loved ones. These ethicists have not determined the issue of when the patient is considered clinically dead in the sense of higher or whole brain functioning. Should there be a definition of death in place? The constant debate over whether the PVS patient in loss of higher brain death, should in fact be let off AN&H is a struggle that Philosophers and Doctors continue to debate. If I were to be in the PVS position, the answer would be to let me live until 'natural' forces take my life, for the hopeful fact remains that regaining spontaneous consciousness perhaps could prevail. Can the medical profession or Harvard ad hoc committee hold the upper hand in making such definitions in light of such speculation as to whether there is a definition for such a finite state?

2. Scott B. Rae, "Moral choices; An introduction to ethics" Grand Rapids, MI: Vandervan Publishing 1995.

Some topics in this essay:
PVS PVS, AN&H PVS, Withdrawal AN&H, God PVS, , Philosophers Doctors, Withholding AN&H, Website Http//wwwcbhdorg, Ethics Vol, Rae Moral, pvs patients, withdrawal an&h, pvs patient, persistent vegetative, debate pvs, brain death, nutrition hydration, debate pvs patient, an&h provided, medical ethics, grand rapids, grand rapids mi,