The British Union
“I am the husband, and the whole isle is my lawful wife; I am the head and it is my body; I am the shepherd and it is my flock: I hope therefore that no man will be so unreasonable as to think that I, that am a Christian King under the Gospel, should be a polygamist and husband to two wives; that I, being the head, should have a divided and monstrous body; or that being the shepherd to so fair a flock ….. should have my flock parted in two.” This quote from James VI and I shows his desire for there to be a Union, and much of his reign was spent trying to promote a union being formed. However, how did the different nations of ‘Britain’ feel about a union, and did the attitudes that the individual nations had change? The multiple kingdoms of ‘Britain’ were very different to each other. Legal systems, political traditions, the instruments of government and the social structures of England, Scotland and Ireland and the principality of Wales were not only different from each other but had widely ranging regional differences. The issue of religion was also highly contentious, and unifying a country which had at least three different cultures, 2 contrasting forms of Protestantism and a second religion and 7 differen
Between 1604 and 1607, the debate over a union gets much attention. In this period the debate is at its most explicit and least subtle. The issue of a union is one which is crucial to understanding most of the seventeenth century. The borders between England and Scotland were also lessened in their military, feudalistic theme. The communication between England and Scotland was also improved to help matters. However, the English did not reject a union out of hand. It would have been possible to get some kind of union passed, but it would have needed to have been a stricter form of incorporative union, James’s version was too weak. English MP’s wanted to suggest that Scotland should simply accept everything English, including English Common Law, and convert to the English church. Their reasoning for this was quite simply that they believed it all to be superior. At one level, there was a precedent for this kind of union, that of England and Wales, however, it would be arrogant to assume that Scotland would accept this kind of union. By 1607, people were tired of talk to a union, but as we will see this was not the end of the story. Disdain between the two countries did lessen over time, and was helped by gradual, bit by bit reforms. English style M.P’s were introduced into Scotland. It was believed that by building on the two countries similarities, you could disarm critics who made the most of their differences. There was slow reform and if objections were raised then it was rare that the planned reform would be pushed through, people didn’t want to push too hard for union and blow their chances all together. There was a congruity established, with the two kingdoms moving closer together over time and building on their resemblances. One way in which he did this was to integrate the English and Scottish aristocracy i
Some topics in this essay:
England Incorporative,
James VI,
England Scotland,
Scotland Ireland,
English Scotland,
English MP’s,
English Scottish,
Common Law,
English Trading,
King Gospel,
england scotland,
incorporative union,
english mp’s,
england english,
james vi,
form incorporative union,
didn’t exist,
english common,
form incorporative,
body shepherd,
common law,
english common law,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1251
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The British Union Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|