Britian vs. Indians
In the late eighteen and nineteen hundreds, imperialism, stemming mostly from Europe, caused the continents for Africa and Asia to be broken up into colonial territories. Of the many areas Britain entered, claimed and colonized, India was one of them. However, both the British and the Indians saw and experienced different positive and negative effects of imperialism. The British, having been the ones doing the colonizing, obviously saw the good in having India as a colony. As O.P. Austin said in Document 1, Britain got the raw materials and produce from the land. In turn, Britain took these goods and finished them in English factories. Afterwards, they were re-sold very convenient market in India. Austin justifies this money making scheme by explaining how Britain has given Indians the “blessings of civilization” such as food, factories, schools, and development of the land. Even some Indians, like Dadahabai Naoroji agreed in part with imperialism in India. The major point Naoroji makes in Document 2 is that Britain brought political peace to the country. Another Indian, Romesh Dutt, repeats the same thing, calling peace “the greatest human blessing.” He also adds that Britain helped India out by introducing it
Some topics in this essay:
Britain Indians, Reginald Coupland, Mohandas Ghandi, Dadahabai Naroji, Jawharlal Nehru, Romesh Dutt, JAR Marriot, British Indians, Sepoy Rebellion, Austin Document, imperialism india, british imperialism, benefits india receive, benefits india, british indians, raw materials, india receive, imperialism british, britain finished, colonization india, british people,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 802
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|