The first amendment, ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances’, illustrates a clear wish on behalf of the founding fathers to prevent congress from limiting the establishment and exercise of religion of any denomination. This amendment paved the way for America to become a diverse society in which religions of all types would be able to play a role in shaping society.
Religion has played and continues to play a key role in shaping world politics. In countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, Islam not only shapes law but also dominates politics, all decisions being scrutinised by respected religious leaders. These countries may be considered to be at one extreme end of the religion and politics debate, secular states such as China being at the opposite end of the spectrum.
In America religious affiliation has often led to
Wald (1996) noted that American religion had managed to remain independent of then political process but reserved the right to pass judgement. In this way the Church has remained unscathed as when religious leaders enter the political fray they undermine their affiliated religion. Furthering the claim that religion and politics is incompatible, at least in the public’s eyes is the series of Gallop polls post 1985 which shows a consistent distrust for institutions but also shows that the military is the most trusted institution in America, the people’s faith in the Church constantly declining.
Of particular concern to moderate commentators is the perceived power of the religious right. This interest group is considered to be especially strong, being well-funded and enjoying success in particular areas such as Louisiana Utah and the rural Bible Belt. Their influence is however limited to these designated areas and in order to gain votes in other areas are compelled to hide their strength of belief. This once again illustrates the perseverance of the first amendment, whether one religion h