There are many psychological ways of learning and most of them are closely related, but the two that are most widely diverse are behaviorism and humanism. The following information was supposed to be a contrast and comparison, but humanism and behaviorism are so different that I have found no comparisons except that they are both ways of learning.
The definition of “behaviorism is a theoretical orientation based on the premise that scientific psychology should study only observable behavior”. This means that behaviorists believe that the only way to study behavior is by watching people’s actions and reactions to certain stimuli. Most commonly, behaviorists explain personality in terms of how people learn. People being “trained” by a behaviorist, usually learn from and by external motivation.
Behaviorists are more often found to be like a trainer and are more likely to be helping children than adults. Their conclusions are verifiable
Humanists have been identified as more like a facilitator than a trainer, like a behaviorist. Their beliefs are of strong or excessive appeal to the emotions and the principle or habit of accepting reason as the supreme authority in matters of opinion, belief, or conduct. More simply put, their beliefs are based on emotionalism and rationalism.
Behaviorism may be a good way to teach a child, but once the individual comes of age where he or she can make decisions on their own, a humanistic approach may be in order. Depending on how fast a child matures determines how soon the humanistic approach could be used. As long as the child is still living with Mom or Dad, behaviorism may always be a good alternative.