Animal testing is not bad in everyone’s eyes. Many medical breakthroughs have resulted from testing medications on animals. (Charles University Second Department) If it was not for those little creatures we would still have many diseases with no cure. Animal testing has its good and bad points. It all depends on which side you are on.

Many people look upon animal testing as though it is cruel and unusual pun

Many animals have contributed to the saving of thousands of human lives. Scientific breakthroughs have been made as a result of testing medications on animals. Tumors; kidney disease, Hodgkin’s Disease, pigment augmentation, tissues and structure, cancer, and the control of oxygen transmitted through the blood are all different medical problems that have been helped or cured through the use of animal testing.(Charles University Second Department) The pro-test groups want to show others that animal testing has its good sides too: it is a good investment for our future.

Other people tend to look at animal testing differently. It is thought that we should continue to test medications and products on animals. Animals have been used to test everyday products such as soap, cologne, makeup, Chapstick®, sun lotions and artificial organs (heart, lung, liver, kidney)(Woo

Some topics in this essay:
University Department, York Times, League British, Greeks Chinese, Bloyd People, Hodgkin’s Disease, Woods Animal, animal testing, , university department, charles university department, Charles University, animal testing bad, ethical treatment animals, artificial organs, ethical treatment, bloyd people, testing experimentation, animal testing experimentation, treatment animals, testing medications animals, testing bad, charles university, live animals,