Francis bacon
Francis Bacon was a philosopher and a politician who came from a noble family, and would also become nephew by marriage to William Cecil, 1st Minister of Queen Elizabeth then. Bacon studied law and became a member of Parliament and, in part thanks to that, he was given a lots of titles, such as knight, attorney general, lord chancellor, Baron Verulan and Viscount St. Albans. But soon after all those prosper times, he would be accused of corruption (even though most politicians were corrupt in those times) and thus had to abandon politics. Because of this, he would dedicate the rest of his life to science and writing. He had quite a strong faith in science and induction (which consists in achieving a general theory from individual facts), which was considered by him to be the new “spirit” to reach the truth. Hence his dislike for the scholastics, who defended abstract reasoning, even ignoring the observation of nature. Bacon wanted to base knowledge on the accumulation of facts, and he would even got to ignore the role that hypothesis play in order to elaborate a theory, which is fundamental. Anyway, this empiricist would have lots of followers and disciples, who would later prom
This essay is absolutely related to the society of that time: a society that was changing, that wanted to left behind all those dark Middle Ages and that wanted to make a good use of their thinking and understanding. It might be said that Bacon was a philosopher that changed his society… but he was not the only one: Occam, Bacon, Locke, Hume, all these empiricists and many more people, like painters, writers, etc. help and drove this revolution brought in part by the Renaissance, made this possible. That is way, the role that science plays in this text is so important. It is clear that we are before an empiricist’s essay when we notice that everything is related to experience; for instance: line 3 “those that are learned”, “expert men” (= men of experience); line 8: “they (= studies) perfect nature, and they are perfected by experience”; line 13: “…, won by observation” (= wise men acquire skills to use studies through observation and meditation); line 26: there is an identification between natural philosophy and science, which means that we learn by observation. This essay (“Of Studies”, 1625) is the remake of the former version, which had been written by him in 1597. In the former version (1597), the style was solemn and aphoristic, whereas in the latter (1625), we can still find some aphoristic elements, but it also provides more connectives and transitions, which gives it a smoother style. His style is always high: he talks as he was always right, without stopping to think that he may also be wrong. The way he writes is curt and distinct, but smooth, because it never gets you tired and the sen
Some topics in this essay:
Society England,
Locke Hume,
St Albans,
Elizabeth Bacon,
Middle Ages,
Francis Bacon,
FRANCIS BACON,
William Cecil,
line 27,
= read,
“of studies” 1625,
= read entirely,
read entirely,
former version,
from line,
line 15,
observation nature,
“of studies”,
studies” 1625,
bacon philosopher,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1111
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Francis bacon Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|