Employee Involvement and HR
Today, workers are often valued and more and more are regarded as an investment, rather than as a commodity to be traded or tossed aside. Employees and employers, alike, are concerned with fostering a good working environment. We hear terms like “job satisfaction.” According to contemporary business practices, employees are becoming more involved. In fact, it is the principle argument of this paper that there is a direct correlation between the idea of job satisfaction and employee involvement. But how exactly does employee involvement and teamwork influence job satisfaction? First we must analyze the meaning of employee involvement and what it is to be a team. According to Steven L. McShane, author of Canadian Organizational Behaviour, employee involvement is “the degree to which employees share information, knowledge, rewards, and power throughout the organization.”# Robbins defines a work team as one which generates positive synergy through coordinated effort.”# Team effectiveness, benefits, and consequences all played a key role in why Hart Associates# was so successful, and they are accorded a degree of consideration in the following pages. By examining these factors, one will understand how employee invo
Adequate resources, leadership, and performance evaluation and rewards, frame the context of a team. If the health benefit orientation did not provide employees with the needed information about each provider, employees would be lacking a mandatory resource and would not be able to come up with a decision. When companies develop teams they must take into consideration that in order to succeed they must have continuing support from the organization.# They must also realize that effective leadership consists of designing a plan that team members can follow. At Hart Associates, each team member decided to research a different benefit provider and then meet and present what they had learned. The work was separated equally and each employee had his/her own job.# Performance evaluation and rewards helps motivate employees progression in the team. Employees at Hart Associates turned to their coworkers for direction. Robbins suggests that “…sitting down and discussing] both individual and team behaviour helps keep the team on track.”# This seemed to be evident in Hart Associates and proved to be a positive way of evaluating team members. For a team to be successful it must process conflict, specific goals and a common purpose, team efficacy, and social loafing. This means a team must understand what goals and purposes will help them succeed as a team and how conflict and social loafing could help or disrupt a teams progress. A common purpose “…provides direction and guidance under any and all conditions.”# For instance, teams at Hart and Associates’ purpose was to agree on a health care benefit plan that would benefit the staff in that team. The specific goals along the way, like developing groups to research certain health care benefit carriers, were made to “…help teams maintain their focus on achieving results.”# When getting to these goals and even when finishing the project, employees gain a sense of worth and confidence personally and within the team. Because employees at Hart Associates had a positive outcome, they were motivated to take part in another team experience. Although conflict in teams does occur, employees do not need to feel threatened by this. Disagreements serve to be positive outlet for an employees. A common way of brainstorming is to throw ideas out on the table and develop them. Some ideas get thrown out the window, while others are kept. If everyone at Hart Associates agreed to the same health care card without
Some topics in this essay:
Hart Associates,
Hart Associates’,
Hart Associates#,
,
Organizational Behaviour,
Susan Heathfield,
Team Traps,
hart associates,
employee involvement,
health care,
employees hart associates,
Steven McShane,
job satisfaction,
employees hart,
teams hart,
care card,
Steven Rayner,
health care card,
health care benefit,
common purpose,
teams hart associates,
team environment,
hart associates’,
employee involvement team,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1682
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Employee Involvement and HR Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|