Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Andrew jackson gui;lty of crimes to indians

Andrew Jackson, the president of the United States has expanded the country very much. During that process, he has removed many Indians. The trail is prosecuting Andrew Jackson for crimes against humanity. The prosecution argues while white settlers’ moved west, Andrew Jackson made it worse by taking away Indian rights and treating Indians inhumanely. All he wanted is to take them out of the way not for expansion but rather personal reasons. The defense says that Andrew Jackson has not committed any wrongful acts, and only removed the Indians for the interest of the people. However, after looking at both sides of the case, it is obvious by the end of the trail that Andrew Jackson is guilty for crimes against humanity.

First on the stand was Black Hawk. Whites attacked his tribe even after they surrendered and the whites kept killing them. Jackson treated hawk very bad after the war. Usually prisoners of war treated good if they are leaders ad some compromise is sought but Jackson did nothing like that. This shows his personality as a disrespectful person and a personal hate towards the Indians.

Second was John Marshall who ruled that Cherokees should not be treated inhumanly by the government but Jackson was


Third on the stand was Martin Van Burren who was the vice president. He said that Indian removal was necessary and forcing them to leave was the only way they could get rid of them and industrialize. He says Jackson wants good for the people. He is only talking about whites though what about the Indians. What he did for them was nothing. He should be helping both sides not just one. Protecting some of the Indians rights would have helped.

In conclusion, Jackson is guilty of committing crimes against humanity. He treated the Indians in a very bad manner, which was apparent from Black Hawks testimony. The defense and Clay argued he did it for the people, however, Clay and Marshall pointed out that he based many decisions on his personal reasons and had hated the Indians before he was even president. Andrew Jackson could have at least given Indians some rights but he definitely did not think them to be people. Andrew Jackson should be punished because he s responsible for the many deaths and suffrage the Indians went through.

First on the stand for the defense was a white settler Thomas Hamson. He claims that Indians hurt the whites a lot and it is better they stay separated. The prosecution pointed out that Thomas lives in Ohio, which was banned to whites according to the proclamation of 1763. This shows Jackson was not good in making sure the whites follow

Some topics in this essay:
Andrew Jackson, Jackson Indians, Trail Tears, Thomas Hamson, Hawk Whites, Adams Adams, Nicholas Biddle, Caste Indians, Van Burren, Clay Marshall, andrew jackson, personal reasons, removed indians, crimes humanity, jackson indians, stand defense, defense andrew jackson, black hawk, defense andrew, third stand, stand prosecution, andrew jackson indians,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 921
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers