U. S. Politics
1) There are four main reasons that the court has been argued as being an undemocratic institution. These four reasons are; First off, members of the Judiciary are not elected, they are appointed by the Executive and then confirmed by the Senate. Second, federal judges are allowed to serve on a term that lasts until death, they decide to retire, or if they are impeached by the House of Representatives and then convicted by the Senate. This has never happened. Due to this term it is seen that the judges are not held accountable for their actions that take place in court. Thirdly, It is the supreme courts fundamental power that is being questioned whether or not it is undemocratic. It is seen that Judicial Review is countermajoritarian, thus the go against the majority rule which in the end is undemocratic. Finally, it is seen that the Supreme court is less demographically represented than that of our legislative branches. It hasn’t been until the last three decades until women and minorities had broken through into the supreme court, and every member of the court has been a lawyer, thus one profession dominates an entire branch of our government.In defense to these acquisitions one, who supports the court as a necessary part of
The second main objective in politics in the Supreme court is called Strategic Action. This is when any of the nine justices try and convince other Justices to change their mind and vote on their side. This is done through four main ways; First, persuasion on the merits, this is when one uses intellectual arguments to change minds. The second is ingratiation, this is using personal warmth to woo potential supporters. Thirdly is sanctions, which are threats to write a powerful concurrence or dissent . Finally, is bargaining, I help you out here, if you help me out down the line. Justice William Brennan Jr. was an expert at using strategic action. 7. The government and other large corporations view journalists a whole as being liberally biased, they accuse journalists of, “grind ideological axes against big corporations and traditional family values.” In recent years Republicans and Democrats alike worked to cut funding for National Public Radio and broadcasting systems, they argued that these stations were supporting liberalism. Their has only been vary slim evidence that the media is unduly influenced by the political liberalism of journalists. It is hard to say though that journalists are overwhelmingly liberal, in a survey done by the freedom forum, 23% of journalists were liberal while 19% said they were conservative leaving the remainder being, “middle of the road.” The majority of journalists are college graduates from upper to middle –class families. James Fellows , says that journalists if anything are going to be sympathetic towards the interests of the educated elite. “The press chooses
Some topics in this essay:
Democrats Republicans,
Judicial Review,
Brennan Jr,
Public Radio,
Strategic Action,
James Fellows,
,
Earl Warren,
Chief Justice,
House Representatives,
supreme court,
chief justice,
party system,
majority rule,
strategic action,
third party,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1093
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on U. S. Politics Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|