Said's Knowing the oriental
In both Edward Said’s “Knowing the Oriental” and Samuel P. Huntington’s The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order the knowledge of “us” and “them” are used as justifications for England’s control of Egypt and the need for “Western technological and military superiority over other civilizations.” In this paper I will examine how Balfour and Huntington relate their knowledge of “us” and “them” to the policies they endorse, what knowledge of “us” and “them” inhabitants of Egypt and “Islamic” civilizations might want to gather in order to challenge the policies they endorse, and lastly I will examine the conceptual problems that arise when relating knowledge of “us” and “them” to policies regarding “us” and “them.” Balfour justifies the necessity and obligation for British occupation of Egypt when he equates supremacy with “our” knowledge of Egypt; the knowledge of “our” (English) superiority and their inferiority (Egyptian). Balfour’s self proclaimed knowledge of the Egyptian people came from his study of a civilization “from its origins to its prime to its decline.”(Said p.41) He believes that having knowledge of it, or the Oriental co
In Edward W. Said’s book “Knowing the Oriental” he quotes Balfour in saying “To have such knowledge of such a thing (Egypt) is to dominate it.”(Said p.32) I believe that this is a necessary statement because domination of Egypt does not necessarily have to be a result of England’s knowledge of the “Oriental” but can be. For example domination of Egypt by England could have solely been the result of superior military forces. To disprove that this statement is a necessary one I could say that no matter how much military or economic strength a nation has it does not help without having knowledge of the country that you are trying to dominate. An example of this that could be used is the war in Vietnam. Despite America’s far superior military they were defeated by the Vietnamese because America lacked knowledge of the Vietnamese. untry, allows “us” to dominate “it” and subsequently deny independence to it. He illustrates English and Western superiority by stating the Western capacity for self-government and “Oriental’s” inability to establish it by its own motion. In addition, Balfour views the Orientals as inferior, lacking in initiative, and suspicious. His views on Orientalism and his justification for the policy of occupying Egypt can be described as the “ineradicable distinction between Western superiority and Oriental inferiority.”(Said p.40)
Some topics in this essay:
Fragrant Lotus,
Remaking World,
Study Civilizations,
Golden Lotus,
Islam West,
Balfour Huntington,
Vietnamese Said’s,
Egypt Balfour,
Huntington America,
Despite Chinese,
foot binding,
“us” “them”,
knowledge “us” “them”,
knowledge “us”,
statement sufficient,
disprove statement,
believe statement,
balfour huntington,
“them” policies,
bound feet,
“us” “them” policies,
relating knowledge “us”,
abolish foot,
abolish foot binding,
civilizations remaking world,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2427
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Said Knowing the oriental Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|