Hate speech as a freedom of speech and peaceful assembly is in fact protected by the First Amendment. However, there is a balance with this freedom, if we are to silence these groups or individuals, then we are to be silenced as well. Do we want to be silenced and create the very problem the constitution is here to protect? Go back to pre-constitution days where you could be reprimanded or killed for speaking or demonstrating your beliefs.

To keep the freedom of speech can benefit students in that they can learn through open debate and study and can be enlightened. For example, there could be a group of people who would not like some Indian cultures because they can come to America and receive govern

Many universities have enforced hate speech codes that allow the freedom of speech but protect the student’s rights to participate fully in campus life without being discriminated against. Let’s define a students right to participate fully in campus life without being discriminated against. This is where the line is drawn at University’s in America today. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1942 a case called Chaplinsky v. New Hapshire, that intimidating speech directed at a specific individual in a face-to-face confrontation amounts to, fighting words”, can be punished if their words inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace (ACLU). An example, if a white student stops a black person and utters a racial slur this could obviously have the potential to be considered fighting words or actually start a fight and the white student would be punished for

Some topics in this essay:
, Chaplinsky Hapshire, Relations Act, American Educator, hate speech, Supreme Court, speech codes, freedom speech, campus life, participate campus life, campus life discriminated, life discriminated, participate campus, white student, learn debate, codes allow, protected amendment, speech codes allow, hate speech codes,