Benefits of a Systematic Approach to Problem Solving
Motorola Semiconductors Product Sector (SPS) has several problem solving practices in place. SPS IT, a division under SPS, responsible for Information Technology and Architecture, has adopted most of the practices from the mother company. This paper describes the current problem solving process in place at SPS IT, and what advantages and disadvantages there are from using a systematic process. The paper also compares our current process with the AQP Team Excellence Award Guidelines and Criteria, and it identifies areas of improvement, especially in finding the root cause of a problem. Motorola, as many other organizations today, faces a dynamic environment to operate in. We see changes in every aspect of the business, from processes and economical climates to people and technology supporting the business. The most challenging goal for our company is to ensure we minimize costs and increase profit share. This calls for better quality practices in all areas of the business. Organizations such as AQP and MBNQ have designed decision support and quality systems to help businesses improve workplace quality, by implementing criteria as quality benchmarks. Although these criteria do not spell out specifi
Motorola Semiconductors Product Sector (SPS) has several problem solving practices in place. SPS IT, has adopted most of the practices from the mother company, to come up with their own decision support process. SPS IT has not adopted the AQP Team Excellence Award Criteria. Problems in our workplace, is as common as vacation time taken by employees. The first step people do is to analyze a problem. Problem solving teams are identified, to start the task of gathering as much information as possible to describe and analyze a problem. 1. Not everybody can be an effective critical thinker. What people traditionally call problems are sometimes only symptoms of problems. (Three-Sigma Incorporated) According to Three Sigma Inc, problem causes and problem symptoms can look very much alike. To find root causes of a problem, companies like Three-Sigma Inc, implemented a guideline, which focus on the “multiple why” process until a fundamental cause is apparent. It is time, we look at the bigger picture, and reduce and eliminate work that has no value to the business. This will eliminate the duplication of efforts and application systems with the same functionality. If SPS IT could become a member AQP, we will be one step closer to Quality Excellence. Our people will be trained in the processes and criteria put in place by AQP to improve our workplace through quality and participation practices.
Some topics in this essay:
Award Criteria,
Team Excellence,
Systematic Approach,
Crusciel Field,
Conclusion SPS,
AQP MBNQ,
Three-Sigma Inc,
Introduction Motorola,
Sector SPS,
Technology Architecture,
systematic approach,
aqp team,
root cause,
team excellence,
aqp team excellence,
process sps,
crusciel field 2003,
disadvantages systematic,
workplace quality,
improve workplace,
crusciel field,
field 2003,
disadvantages systematic approach,
practices mother company,
adopted practices mother,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1030
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Benefits of a Systematic Approach to Problem Solving Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|