Understanding the distinction between Becoming and Being helps to understand Plato’s theory of reality. Plato’s world of Being is comprised of realities called Forms, which are the causes of the physical things that exist beneath them – for example, humans, squares, cups, computers, instances of justice and beauty etc. The word Form comes form the Greek word eidos, which translates into form in the sense of shape, appearance etc. However, Plato doesn’t mean Form in the sense of something tangible. The Six features of Platonic Forms are as follows:

1. Objective – they exist “out there” independently of our minds and wills

5. Archetypal – They are models for every thing that does or can exist

1. Material cause – the matter something consists of

Aristotle criticized Plato’s theory of the Forms. He believed that the separation between the Forms and the sensible things make it impossible for the Forms to do anything for those things. Their views differ in how the Forms are related to particular things. He believed that there was no Form without matter and vice versa. According to Aristotle, there are four principles that are necessary to explain any given thing:

4. Intelligible – as realities they can’t be felt by the senses, only by thought

Some topics in this essay:
According Aristotle, Platonic Forms, Timaeus Understanding, Systematic Philosophy, Allegory Cave, Divided Line, Becoming Metaphysical, Thomas Aquinas, Form Form, Beauty Plato, cause �, plato’s theory, theory forms, world becoming, divided line, criticized plato’s theory, allegory cave, understand reality, objective basis, � realities, criticized plato’s, plato’s theory forms, aristotle criticized plato’s, line divided unequal,