Summary of Ellen Frankel Paul

In Ellen Frankel Paul’s essay “Bared Buttocks and Federal Cases”, she examines the existing sexual harassment laws and makes a policy argument based on what she finds.

Paul makes several assertions in her article, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and she argues that this type of sexual harassment should be handled by a tort instead. She also argues that a definition of sexual harassment should be established based on the standards of what a “reasonable man” would find personally harmful.

For support, Paul takes commonly held beliefs and explaining why they are not true. She also states the familiar concept that most sexual harassment occurs when a male in a position of power harasses a female worker.

2. Isn’t your statement that “Sexual harassment is an inevitable corollary to class exploitation; as capitalists exploit workers, so do males in positions of authority exploit there female subordinates”( Paul 705) a fallacy?

3. If you were a secretary and your assistant was dating one of the male co-workers in the office, would you take it offensive if they made lewd remarks to one another? Would it depend if the quality of your assistant’s work is declining?

Finally, at the end of her article, Paul makes the moral argument that if people believe that women should have equal rights, they should agree with her because making laws to protect women from sexual harassment sets them apart as weak and unable to deal with everyday life. Paul says, “Women cannot expect to have it both ways: equality where c

Some topics in this essay:
Rights Act, Frankel Paul, Federal Cases”, sexual harassment, Frankel Paul’s, ellen frankel, Ellen Frankel, ellen frankel paul’s, Buttocks Federal, buttocks federal cases”, Civil Rights, “bared buttocks federal, civil rights act, established based, civil rights, paul makes, rights act, “reasonable man”, definition sexual, federal cases”, buttocks federal,