Sprouting Solutions for Deforestation Dilemma

Perhaps to thoroughly understand a rainforest‘s beauty, one would have to see a rainforest with his very eyes. One would also believe that the many majestic trees and amazingly exotic animals that live there would probably be enough to keep any person form wanting to harm the forests in any way. Unfortunately, like all good things, the biggest rainforest called the Amazon is being destroyed everyday, which is a tremendous loss considering the importance of this particular forest. “The Amazon contains many species and plants not found anywhere else, and considering one-third of all the species in the world live there, it has the greatest biodiversity on earth (“The Amazon,” 2002, p. 1).” The Amazon also goes through a process of continuously taking in carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen and because of this is often referred to as the “Lungs of our Planet” (Taylor, 2001). Another important thing to know is that the basin of the forest contains roughly ten percent of all carbon dioxide in the terrestrial ecosystems (“Amazon carbon ebbs,“ 1998). Although the destruction of rainforests is a growing problem, much is being done to resolve the problem.

Education of the rainforest and awareness of the forest’s many aspects has aroused many solutionsa and would arouse many more. For one, the quality of resource information base needs upgraded. If this was upgraded we would know accurate amounts of acreage destroyed and we could assess specific parts easier (“Deforestation-tropical forests,” 2001). The education of the rainforest and awareness is very important in order to reach the public and reach the decision-makers (“Deforestation-tropical forests,” 2001). Reaching the public is smart because it informs them about the social and economic value of the rainforests, which is vital since rainforests mainly depend on what people think about them as to whether they will rid of them or not (“Deforestation-tropical forests,” 2001). One good argument for the value of the rainforests land is that the land being left alone for harvesting of the natural resources is more valuable than cutting it down. Not a whole lot of people know about this so letting people know and realize this would help solve a bit of the huge problem (Taylor, 2001). “Even experts agreed that by leaving the rainforest in tact and harvesting its many nuts, fruits, oil-production plants, and medicinal plants the rainforest has more economic value than if they were to cut down to make grazing land for cattle or timber (Taylor, 2001, p. 4).” Educating people that land used for cattle is worth sixty dollars per acre and land used for timber is worth four hundred dollars per acre, while not damaging and using and reusing land for its natural resources makes the land worth $2,400 per acre might get them to rethink the way they had planned on using the land (Taylor, 2001).

Sure enough, the rainforests are in danger from all the problems they are facing, but many solutions are in progress and many more can be found and put into action. On an international level, “countries like India, Zimbabwe, and Honduras have developed new approaches to resource--sharing and co-management. They are characterized by agreements between the government and local communities that create true partnerships for the management and benefit--sharing of the forest resource (“Destruction of the,” 2002, p. 3).” “In 1991, Canada established a network of working models of sustainable forest development. The program expanded internationally as Canada’s commitment to UNCED. The models strive to bring resource users together to develop new forest resource management solutions (“Destruction of the,” 2002, p. 3).” Brazil actually has a couple solutions but they feel the best is believed to be reforming natural resource policies (“Destruction of the,” 2002). “The Brazilian state of Acre will use its buying power to substantiate its commitment to certified forestry; Governor Viana has pledged to gradually replace state timber purchases with certified products. He has replaced old furniture with certified pieces and is replacing school desks and chairs with certified furniture (“The Amazon,” 2002, p. 1).” Brazil is also fining illegal loggers and burners, and they are also making it a regulation to keep eighty percent of the purchased land preserved and natural (“In the Amazon,” 1997). Viana also picked out twenty-five percent of forest i

Some topics in this essay:
Brazil They’ve, Pg CO2, Research Center’s, Brazilian Mahogany, Governor Viana, Zimbabwe Honduras, Deforestation Dilemma, Planet” Taylor, Environment Development, G-7 Amazon, forests” 2001, the” 2002, “deforestation-tropical forests” 2001, “deforestation-tropical forests”, “destruction the” 2002, “destruction the”, taylor 2001, 2002 1”, forest loss”, forest loss” 1999, “amazon forest, “the amazon”, loss” 1999, “the amazon” 2002, “amazon forest loss”,