Drinking age
Drinking is a big problem that causes many teen-age deaths in the United States, however, many people still argue that the legal age for drinking should be reduced to eighteen. This issue has been brought up many times, but the law has not been changed, since the change to twenty-one; in 1980. States have become stricter about preventing under-age drinking, but teen-agers have no problem getting alcohol. There are many arguments in favor of changing the drinking age back to eighteen. The facts show that drinking alcohol is too large of a responsibility for an eighteen-year-old to handle. In 1980 the government raised the drinking age to twenty-one because the number of drunk driving accidents was causing many teen-age deaths. The young adults of America considered this law a second prohibition. The main objective of the law was to make the young people happier, healthier, and safer (Smith & Smith 2). Because this law was viewed as a revival of prohibition, it was not widely accepted by the public, and some states were hesitant to pass the new law. Despite the opposition, the government pursued the passage of the law and offered states benefits for their cooperation. Some of these benefits included extra go
The drinking age should not change, but the way the alcohol companies present their products should not be aimed towards younger audiences. One of the main reasons that the age should not be changed back to eighteen is that many eighteen-year-olds are still in high school and can distribute what they purchase to younger peers. More than 1/3 of high school seniors’ drinks to get drunk and if the age was lowered then that number would increase (Smith & Smith 2). Males were more likely to drink than females but by a small margin (56 percent versus 49 percent), but the gender difference for getting drunk is a greater percentage (39 percent versus 29 percent). The law that was passed in 1980 has helped by lowering the percentage of drunk driving accidents by teenagers (Birckmayer & Hemenway 2). Many teen-agers that start before fifteen are four times more likely to become more alcohol dependent as those who begin drinking at age twenty-one are (Birckmayer & Hemenway 1). An eighteen-year-old can not run for office because they are not responsible enough so why should they be able to drink alcohol (Birckmayer & Hemenway 1)? The drinking age should not be changed back to eighteen. An eighteen-year-old is not responsible enough to handle the effects of alcohol. The government made the right decision to rais
Some topics in this essay:
Birckmayer Hemenway,
Smith Smith,
Age Drinking,
drinking age,
birckmayer hemenway,
birckmayer hemenway 1,
hemenway 1,
smith smith 2,
smith smith,
smith 2,
drunk driving,
drinking age eighteen,
drink alcohol,
age twenty-one,
drinking age twenty-one,
alcohol companies,
age eighteen,
twenty-one drunk driving,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 882
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Drinking age Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|