Who is covered and who is not? This is a question that for many years before the law was in place any employer could decide arbitrarily, which led to blatant discrimination regardless of ability, qualification, or willingness to work. With the law in place specific classes of people became protected in the hiring and firing process. “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the centerpiece of efforts to end discrimination in the workplace. It prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, promotion, and terms and conditions of work based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin” (Dolkart, 2003). There is however, specific wording that outlines what kind of employers are liable under the new law. “Title VII applies to all firms or their agents engaged in an industry affecting commerce that employ 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more weeks in the current or preceding calendar year” (Bennet-Alexander & Hartman, 2001). Employers now knew to what extent they were liable under the new law and unlawful employment practices were now defined and in place for these employers to follow and adhere to. This law essentially leveled the employment playing field for people in all five classes. Not only did this impact people of different color, which was a big issue in the 60’s, but it also gave women a boost in their ability to compete with men for jobs and equal pay. The competition for jobs would become fierce as the 70’s and 80’s approached.

t people in relation to employment

Some topics in this essay:
Bennet-Alexander Hartman, Title VII, Rights Act, , Johnson LBJ, Law July, African American, Accommodations OEODM, title vii, John Kennedy, civil rights, “title vii, hiring firing, Civil Rights, vii civil rights, vii civil, support civil, sexual harassment, dolkart 2003, avoid title, impact law, civil rights act, support civil rights, avoid title vii,