How new technology affected war on the Western Front
New technology had a significant impact on how the war was fought on the western front. Technological innovation was relatively slow to occur on the Western Front. Armies and their commanders were too used to outdated, pre-war doctrines, and when change did occur, the attack was generally still inferior to the defence. Only the allies managed to introduce a weapon: as shown in source A- the tank- which was first used by the British against the Germans at the battle of the Somme on 15 September 1916. Haig had great doubts about its capability while Kitchener, described it as a pretty neat toy. Initially tanks had several mechanical problems and broke down regularly. They were also hell to work in. Tank crews reported that conditions were hot, claustrophobic and incredibly noisy. The tank was able to break through the dead lock. Even then, it took more than two years for it to be used effectively enough to consistently penetrate through German lines of defence; Tanks broke the stalemate of trench ware fare in 1918 and resorted to the war of movement. Source A, is a photograph of a British Mark IV tank smashing through barbed wire. The photograph shows how powerful and destructive the tank is as it penetrates a path through the barbe
Source A (ii), is a table, a secondary source showing the statistics of AIF (Australian Imperial Force) casualties caused by different weapons, between April 1916- March 1919. This source shows the most destructive weapon which caused the greatest battle casualties among the AIF, it was shell fragments and shrapnel pellets which killed 72 513 (50.93%). This type of artillery was fired from upgraded versions of cannons, they were used to soften up enemy trenches and attack heavily fortified positions. Light artillery was used in the initial stages on the Western Front such as the French 75-mm field gun, however with time technological developments allowed Germany to develop heavier guns of greater range and more destructive power such as the Big Bertha; however its effectiveness was limited as their immense weight, which meant that rail transport was needed to move them. Shells were used as a way to break through enemy lines of barbed wire, they were extremely dangerous as thin pieces of shrapnel could penetrate deep into the skin and inflict serious wounds. High velocity bullets from machine guns and rifles caused the second most damage as shown in Source A (ii) (33.93%), Rifles were initially used in 1914, and most had a range of 500 meters, and they were deadly in the hands of trained troops. The machine gun was an excellent defensive weapon, with its range between 500 and 1000m it could wipe
Some topics in this essay:
British Lewis,
Front French,
British Germans,
Western Front,
Imperial Force,
Mark IV,
Front Armies,
,
western front,
barbed wire,
technological developments,
source ii,
machine gun,
troops machine gun,
war western front,
fought western front,
shown source,
technological innovations,
fought western,
war source,
troops machine,
ventured chemical biological,
weaponry ventured chemical,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 945
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on How new technology affected war on the Western Front Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|