The Church and State Act that was put in place in 1963 has been the basis of many heated discussions. The government banned open prayer in schools at this time because it was found to be unconstitutional to go against their faith. This means that teachers could no longer encourage prayer or lead prayer during the school day. Even though students cannot be forced to pray or join in on any religious based teachings, they can do so willingly, but only if found no to be disruptive to the class.

Even though students are allowed to pray in school, any discussions on religion are blatantly discouraged. In Ontario an Islamic student was sent home because of her attire. She wore head scarves because her religion forbids her to show+ her head uncovered. Since the school policy states that no student may wear head coverings of any kind (exp. Hats), the girl was reprimanded for following the guidelines of her chosen religion. Shera Rashid explains, “I was told I could not wear my hijab to school because it broke the dress code. I had to change schools because if I were to be seen in public without my hijab I would shame my family and my Mosque.”

life, but by promoting secularism in schools, and discouraging religion we are giving the message that religion is the weaker of the two. This defies the First Amendment that we were trying to protect by removing religion from schools in the first place.

The well known evangelist Billy Graham similarly preached “Why should the majority be so severely penalized by the protests if a handful?”

Some topics in this essay:
Marcus Wright, Globe Mail, Church Act, Tom Mitchell, Elliott Trudeau, Ontario Islamic, Shera Rashid, British Columbia, Billy Graham, Tolerance Discouragement, school day, bible school, today’s schools, bringing bible, religion secularism, prayer school, bringing bible school,